Literature DB >> 24157811

One mouse, one patient paradigm: New avatars of personalized cancer therapy.

Prerna Malaney1, Santo V Nicosia1, Vrushank Davé2.   

Abstract

Over the last few decades, study of cancer in mouse models has gained popularity. Sophisticated genetic manipulation technologies and commercialization of these murine systems have made it possible to generate mice to study human disease. Given the large socio-economic burden of cancer, both on academic research and the health care industry, there is a need for in vivo animal cancer models that can provide a rationale that is translatable to the clinic. Such a bench-to-bedside transition will facilitate a long term robust strategy that is economically feasible and clinically effective to manage cancer. The major hurdles in considering mouse models as a translational platform are the lack of tumor heterogeneity and genetic diversity, which are a hallmark of human cancers. The present review, while critical of these pitfalls, discusses two newly emerging concepts of personalized mouse models called "Mouse Avatars" and Co-clinical Trials. Development of "Mouse Avatars" entails implantation of patient tumor samples in mice for subsequent use in drug efficacy studies. These avatars allow for each patient to have their own tumor growing in an in vivo system, thereby allowing the identification of a personalized therapeutic regimen, eliminating the cost and toxicity associated with non-targeted chemotherapeutic measures. In Co-clinical Trials, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) are used to guide therapy in an ongoing human patient trial. Murine and patient trials are conducted concurrently, and information obtained from the murine system is applied towards future clinical management of the patient's tumor. The concurrent trials allow for a real-time integration of the murine and human tumor data. In combination with several molecular profiling techniques, the "Mouse Avatar" and Co-clinical Trial concepts have the potential to revolutionize the drug development and health care process. The present review outlines the current status, challenges and the future potential of these two new in vivo approaches in the field of personalized oncology.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography; 18FDG-PET; APL; Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia; Co-clinical Trial; Drug discovery; FDA; GEMMs; Genetically engineered mouse models; HDAC; MTA; Material Transfer Agreement; Mouse Avatars; NOD scid gamma; NSCLC; NSG; PDTX; Personalized medicine; Xenograft models; genetically enginereed mouse models; histone deacetylase; non-small cell lung cancer; patient-derived tumor xenograft; the food and drug administration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24157811      PMCID: PMC4092874          DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  93 in total

1.  Eradication of acute promyelocytic leukemia-initiating cells by PML/RARA-targeting.

Authors:  Rihab Nasr; Hugues de Thé
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  A murine lung cancer co-clinical trial identifies genetic modifiers of therapeutic response.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Katherine Cheng; Zandra Walton; Yuchuan Wang; Hiromichi Ebi; Takeshi Shimamura; Yan Liu; Tanya Tupper; Jing Ouyang; Jie Li; Peng Gao; Michele S Woo; Chunxiao Xu; Masahiko Yanagita; Abigail Altabef; Shumei Wang; Charles Lee; Yuji Nakada; Christopher G Peña; Yanping Sun; Yoko Franchetti; Catherine Yao; Amy Saur; Michael D Cameron; Mizuki Nishino; D Neil Hayes; Matthew D Wilkerson; Patrick J Roberts; Carrie B Lee; Nabeel Bardeesy; Mohit Butaney; Lucian R Chirieac; Daniel B Costa; David Jackman; Norman E Sharpless; Diego H Castrillon; George D Demetri; Pasi A Jänne; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Lewis C Cantley; Andrew L Kung; Jeffrey A Engelman; Kwok-Kin Wong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Jennifer Lund; Deanna Kepka; Angela Mariotto
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development.

Authors:  John J Tentler; Aik Choon Tan; Colin D Weekes; Antonio Jimeno; Stephen Leong; Todd M Pitts; John J Arcaroli; Wells A Messersmith; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Personalizing cancer treatment in the age of global genomic analyses: PALB2 gene mutations and the response to DNA damaging agents in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Maria C Villarroel; N V Rajeshkumar; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Ana De Jesus-Acosta; Siân Jones; Anirban Maitra; Ralph H Hruban; James R Eshleman; Alison Klein; Daniel Laheru; Ross Donehower; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  The prognostic significance of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway activation in human gliomas.

Authors:  Arnab Chakravarti; Gary Zhai; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Sormeh Sarkesh; Peter M Black; Alona Muzikansky; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Potential of the scid mouse as a host for human tumors.

Authors:  B M Mueller; R A Reisfeld
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Establishment of patient-derived non-small cell lung cancer xenografts as models for the identification of predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Iduna Fichtner; Jana Rolff; Richie Soong; Jens Hoffmann; Stefanie Hammer; Anette Sommer; Michael Becker; Johannes Merk
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Integrated preclinical and clinical development of S-trans, trans-Farnesylthiosalicylic Acid (FTS, Salirasib) in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Laheru; Preeti Shah; N V Rajeshkumar; Florencia McAllister; Gretchen Taylor; Howard Goldsweig; Dung T Le; Ross Donehower; Antonio Jimeno; Sheila Linden; Ming Zhao; Dongweon Song; Michelle A Rudek; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Intravenous injection of oncolytic picornavirus SVV-001 prolongs animal survival in a panel of primary tumor-based orthotopic xenograft mouse models of pediatric glioma.

Authors:  Zhigang Liu; Xiumei Zhao; Hua Mao; Patricia A Baxter; Yulun Huang; Litian Yu; Lalita Wadhwa; Jack M Su; Adekunle Adesina; Lazlo Perlaky; Mary Hurwitz; Neeraja Idamakanti; Seshidhar Reddy Police; Paul L Hallenbeck; Richard L Hurwitz; Ching C Lau; Murali Chintagumpala; Susan M Blaney; Xiao-Nan Li
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 12.300

View more
  115 in total

Review 1.  Pathomimetic cancer avatars for live-cell imaging of protease activity.

Authors:  Kyungmin Ji; Joshua Heyza; Dora Cavallo-Medved; Bonnie F Sloane
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 4.079

Review 2.  Patient-Derived Xenografts as a Model System for Radiation Research.

Authors:  Christopher D Willey; Ashley N Gilbert; Joshua C Anderson; George Yancey Gillespie
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 3.  Preclinical mouse cancer models: a maze of opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Chi-Ping Day; Glenn Merlino; Terry Van Dyke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Patient-derived xenograft models in gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Clare L Scott; Helen J Mackay; Paul Haluska
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

Review 5.  Heralding a new paradigm in 3D tumor modeling.

Authors:  Eliza L S Fong; Daniel A Harrington; Mary C Farach-Carson; Hanry Yu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as a versatile patient-derived xenograft (PDX) platform for precision medicine and preclinical research.

Authors:  Logan C DeBord; Ravi R Pathak; Mariana Villaneuva; Hsuan-Chen Liu; Daniel A Harrington; Wendong Yu; Michael T Lewis; Andrew G Sikora
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  An Empirical Approach Leveraging Tumorgrafts to Dissect the Tumor Microenvironment in Renal Cell Carcinoma Identifies Missing Link to Prognostic Inflammatory Factors.

Authors:  Rong Lu; Payal Kapur; Bijay S Jaiswal; Tao Wang; Raquibul Hannan; Ze Zhang; Ivan Pedrosa; Jason J Luke; He Zhang; Leonard D Goldstein; Qurratulain Yousuf; Yi-Feng Gu; Tiffani McKenzie; Allison Joyce; Min S Kim; Xinlei Wang; Danni Luo; Oreoluwa Onabolu; Christina Stevens; Zhiqun Xie; Mingyi Chen; Alexander Filatenkov; Jose Torrealba; Xin Luo; Wenbin Guo; Jingxuan He; Eric Stawiski; Zora Modrusan; Steffen Durinck; Somasekar Seshagiri; James Brugarolas
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Mice engrafted with human hematopoietic stem cells support a human myeloid cell inflammatory response in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew Baird; Chenliang Deng; Matthew H Eliceiri; Fatima Haghi; Xitong Dang; Raul Coimbra; Todd W Costantini; Bruce E Torbett; Brian P Eliceiri
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 9.  Choosing The Right Animal Model for Renal Cancer Research.

Authors:  Paweł Sobczuk; Anna Brodziak; Mohammed Imran Khan; Stuti Chhabra; Michał Fiedorowicz; Marlena Wełniak-Kamińska; Kamil Synoradzki; Ewa Bartnik; Agnieszka Cudnoch-Jędrzejewska; Anna M Czarnecka
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 10.  Circulating tumor cells and CDX models as a tool for preclinical drug development.

Authors:  Alice Lallo; Maximilian W Schenk; Kristopher K Frese; Fiona Blackhall; Caroline Dive
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.