Literature DB >> 29904169

Epigenetic paternal effects as costly, condition-dependent traits.

Erin L Macartney1, Angela J Crean2,3, Russell Bonduriansky2.   

Abstract

It is now recognized that post-copulatory traits, such as sperm and ejaculate production can impose metabolic costs, and such traits are therefore expected to exhibit condition-dependent expression, whereby, low condition individuals experience a greater marginal cost of investment compared to high condition individuals. Ejaculates are especially costly in species where males invest in offspring quality through nutrient-rich spermatophores or other seminal nuptial gifts. However, recent evidence shows that, in species where males do not provision females or offspring, males can still influence offspring development through paternal effects mediated by epigenetic factors, such as non-coding RNAs, DNA methylation and chromatin structure. Because such epigenetic paternal effects do not involve the transfer of substantial quantities of resources, such as nutrients, the costs of conferring such effects have not been considered. Here we argue that if selection favours paternal investment in offspring quality through epigenetic factors, then the epigenetic machinery required to bring about such effects may also be expected to evolve strongly condition-dependent expression. We outline indirect evidence suggesting that epigenetic paternal effects could impose substantial metabolic costs, consider the conditions under which selection may act on such effects, and suggest ways to test for differential costs and condition-dependence of these effects. Incorporating epigenetic paternal effects into condition-dependent life history theory will further our understanding of the heritability of fitness and the evolution of paternal investment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29904169      PMCID: PMC6082865          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-018-0096-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  100 in total

1.  Effects of different male remating intervals on the reproductive success of Choristoneura rosaceana males and females.

Authors:  Mireille Marcotte; Johanne Delisle; Jeremy N McNeil
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 2.  Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Randy L Jirtle; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Maternal and paternal condition effects on offspring phenotype in Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae).

Authors:  R Bonduriansky; M Head
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Sexual selection and the evolution of sperm quality.

Authors:  John L Fitzpatrick; Stefan Lüpold
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Nongenetic inheritance and the evolution of costly female preference.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky; T Day
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  What is a paternal effect?

Authors:  Angela J Crean; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Paternal DNA packaging in spermatozoa: more than the sum of its parts? DNA, histones, protamines and epigenetics.

Authors:  David Miller; Martin Brinkworth; David Iles
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Ageing-associated changes in the human DNA methylome: genomic locations and effects on gene expression.

Authors:  Saara Marttila; Laura Kananen; Sergei Häyrynen; Juulia Jylhävä; Tapio Nevalainen; Antti Hervonen; Marja Jylhä; Matti Nykter; Mikko Hurme
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Extreme costs of mating for male two-spot ladybird beetles.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Crystal T Tse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Experimental evolution reveals that sperm competition intensity selects for longer, more costly sperm.

Authors:  Joanne L Godwin; Ramakrishnan Vasudeva; Łukasz Michalczyk; Oliver Y Martin; Alyson J Lumley; Tracey Chapman; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2017-06-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Development time mediates the effect of larval diet on ageing and mating success of male antler flies in the wild.

Authors:  Christopher S Angell; Mathieu J Oudin; Nicolas O Rode; Brian S Mautz; Russell Bonduriansky; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolutionary consequences of epigenetic inheritance.

Authors:  Martin I Lind; Foteini Spagopoulou
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Dietary macronutrient balance and fungal infection as drivers of spermatophore quality in the mealworm beetle.

Authors:  Alicia Reyes-Ramírez; Maya Rocha-Ortega; Alex Córdoba-Aguilar
Journal:  Curr Res Insect Sci       Date:  2021-01-16

4.  Separating the effects of paternal age and mating history: Evidence for sex-specific paternal effect in eastern mosquitofish.

Authors:  Upama Aich; Shawan Chowdhury; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Nongenetic paternal effects via seminal fluid.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Maxine Lovegrove
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2019-07-08

6.  Mapping the past, present and future research landscape of paternal effects.

Authors:  Joanna Rutkowska; Malgorzata Lagisz; Russell Bonduriansky; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Parent-of-Origin Effects on Seed Size Modify Heterosis Responses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Rosa Castillo-Bravo; Antoine Fort; Ronan Cashell; Galina Brychkova; Peter C McKeown; Charles Spillane
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.