BACKGROUND: This study examined metabolic energy cost and external mechanical work for step-to-step transitions after tibiotalar arthrodesis, and the effect of MBT rocker bottom shoes. METHODS: Oxygen uptake, forceplate and kinematic data were recorded in 18 controls and 15 patients while walking at a fixed speed of 1.25 m/s in three walking conditions: barefoot, normal walking shoes and MBT rocker bottom shoes. Metabolic energy cost, external mechanical work, and the roll-over shape of the ankle-foot complex were analyzed. FINDINGS: Tibiotalar arthrodesis leads to higher metabolic energy cost during walking. During step-to-step transitions positive work during push-off with the impaired ankle was decreased but negative work during collision was not affected. The roll-over shape of the ankle-foot complex did not differ between groups and shoe conditions. However, both in patients and controls rocker bottom shoes did lead to decreased positive work at push-off and increased negative work at collision and consequently higher metabolic energy cost of walking. INTERPRETATION: External mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is not different between patients and controls and could not account for the higher metabolic energy cost in patients. Apparently, patients adopt a different walking strategy that limits step-to-step transition cost but nevertheless induces a higher metabolic energy cost. Despite restricted ankle movement, patients retain a normal roll-over shape of the ankle-foot complex. MBT shoes do not affect roll-over shape and appear to have a counterproductive effect on step-to-step transition cost and walking economy. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: This study examined metabolic energy cost and external mechanical work for step-to-step transitions after tibiotalar arthrodesis, and the effect of MBT rocker bottom shoes. METHODS:Oxygen uptake, forceplate and kinematic data were recorded in 18 controls and 15 patients while walking at a fixed speed of 1.25 m/s in three walking conditions: barefoot, normal walking shoes and MBT rocker bottom shoes. Metabolic energy cost, external mechanical work, and the roll-over shape of the ankle-foot complex were analyzed. FINDINGS: Tibiotalar arthrodesis leads to higher metabolic energy cost during walking. During step-to-step transitions positive work during push-off with the impaired ankle was decreased but negative work during collision was not affected. The roll-over shape of the ankle-foot complex did not differ between groups and shoe conditions. However, both in patients and controls rocker bottom shoes did lead to decreased positive work at push-off and increased negative work at collision and consequently higher metabolic energy cost of walking. INTERPRETATION: External mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is not different between patients and controls and could not account for the higher metabolic energy cost in patients. Apparently, patients adopt a different walking strategy that limits step-to-step transition cost but nevertheless induces a higher metabolic energy cost. Despite restricted ankle movement, patients retain a normal roll-over shape of the ankle-foot complex. MBT shoes do not affect roll-over shape and appear to have a counterproductive effect on step-to-step transition cost and walking economy. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Karl E Zelik; Steven H Collins; Peter G Adamczyk; Ava D Segal; Glenn K Klute; David C Morgenroth; Michael E Hahn; Michael S Orendurff; Joseph M Czerniecki; Arthur D Kuo Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Ava D Segal; Karl E Zelik; Glenn K Klute; David C Morgenroth; Michael E Hahn; Michael S Orendurff; Peter G Adamczyk; Steven H Collins; Arthur D Kuo; Joseph M Czerniecki Journal: Hum Mov Sci Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 2.161
Authors: Jennifer A Nichols; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Amy L Lenz; Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; K Bo Foreman; Alexej Barg; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 6.558