Literature DB >> 20571808

[Evaluation of the need for communication training of ophthalmologists for gaining telephone consent for cornea donation].

S Stiel1, S Salla, A Steinfeld, L Radbruch, P Walter, M Hermel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Because of the gap between the high need for cornea tissue for transplantation and the current lower numbers of donors, there is high pressure to succeed in telephone calls to relatives of deceased for obtaining consent. Besides the attempt to increase the rate of donors, these telephone calls should be gentle for relatives and not overstrain professionals. This study assesses the need and expectations of physicians towards communication training in preparation for their task.
METHODS: In September-October 2009 a needs assessment for communication training among physicians who currently work or have worked for the eye bank took place. Personal data were recorded and their estimate of the perceived burden as well as needs and potential benefits from a specific communication training for obtaining consent for cornea donation by telephone were assessed using numeric rating scales between 1 (minimum) and 10 (maximum). Results were expressed as mean and range.
RESULTS: The participants felt only moderately prepared for the task regarding information content, their emotions and personal convictions. They considered a specific training to be highly meaningful, necessary and helpful. Their highest burden during telephone calls previously experienced was documented as 8.4 and the average burden as 6.3. Accordingly, their willingness to continue working at an eye bank after their rotation was moderate. DISCUSSION: Physicians involved in obtaining consent for cornea donation by telephone feel highly stressed and only moderately prepared for fulfilling the task both for the information content and on the emotional level. Accordingly, specific communication training is perceived as highly meaningful, necessary and helpful. An educational program was developed to meet the needs and expectations of physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20571808     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-010-2209-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  12 in total

1.  Obtaining cornea donation consent by telephone.

Authors:  Philippe Gain; Gilles Thuret; Jean Loup Pugniet; Patricia Rizzi; Sophie Acquart; Jean Claude Le Petit; Jean Maugery
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Rates of potential and actual cornea donation in a general hospital: impact of exhaustive death screening and surrogate phone consent.

Authors:  A Geissler; K Paoli; C Maitrejean; J Durand-Gasselin
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Cornea donation: evaluation of a training session to obtain consent by telephone.

Authors:  A Geissler; P R Gerbeaux; C Maitrejean; J Durand-Gasselin
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  [Willingness to donate organs - Strategies to influence attitude].

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Schulz; Stefan Gold; Monika von Dem Knesebeck; Uwe Koch
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol       Date:  2002-01

5.  Consent for corneal donation: the effect of age of the deceased, registered intent and which family member is asked about donation.

Authors:  M Lawlor; T Dobbins; K-A Thomas; F Billson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The process of organ donation and its effect on consent.

Authors:  L A Siminoff; R M Arnold; J Hewlett
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Organ donation: key factors influencing families' decision-making.

Authors:  M Sque; T Long; S Payne
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Organ donation in the accident and emergency department: a study of relatives' views.

Authors:  A Wellesley; E Glucksman; R Crouch
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1997-01

9.  Evaluation of organ donor card holders among public officials of a major German city.

Authors:  M Heuer; S Hertel; U Wirges; T Philipp; G Gerken; A Paul; G M Kaiser
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  The needs of family members of organ and tissue donors.

Authors:  M L Pelletier
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.210

View more
  5 in total

1.  Attitudes toward postmortem cornea donation in Germany: a multicenter survey.

Authors:  C E Uhlig; R Koch; J Promesberger; G Hirschfeld; H Schmidt; B Seitz; T Reinhard; D Böhringer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Results of an internet-based survey amongst members of the German Ophthalmological Society concerning postmortem cornea donation].

Authors:  C E Uhlig; J Promesberger; G Hirschfeld; R Koch; T Reinhard; B Seitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Corneal donation : Dilemma between growing demand and declining donor rate].

Authors:  F Schaub; H G Simons; P Enders; B O Bachmann; S Roters; C Cursiefen; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The Role of Specifically Tailored Communication Training Among Factors Influencing Consent for Cornea Donation Requested Via Telephone.

Authors:  Martin Hermel; Kathrin Monhof; Andre Steinfeld; Sabine Salla; Nicole Hamsley; Peter Walter; Stephanie Stiel
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Corneal donation for research versus for transplantation: A-year prospective study of acceptance rates in a French University Hospital.

Authors:  Thibaud Garcin; Jean Loup Pugniet; Thierry Peyragrosse; Francoise Rogues; Sophie Acquart; Fabrice Cognasse; Gilles Thuret; Philippe Gain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.