BACKGROUND: Analysis of willingness for postmortem cornea donation by professionals in ophthalmology and their motives in favor of or against donation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 3887 members of the German Ophthalmological Society received an anonymous questionnaire concerning sociodemographic background, physical health, experiences with organ explantation and their former engagement and motives concerning organ and cornea donation. RESULTS: 722 of the questionnaires were partially and 533 completely answered with an average willingness for cornea donation of 79.4%. Significant parameters for cornea donation were gender, former experience with organ explantation, ophthalmological health and fear of false diagnosis of brain death, worse medical treatment or organ commercialization. Of the participants 53.9% suggested the internet as a favorite source of information in this matter. CONCLUSION: The factors which had a significant impact on cornea donation in this survey seem to be mainly a result of insufficient information. Detailed information regarding this topic should preferentially be presented on internet pages of professional societies and could probably increase donation approval of DOG members.
BACKGROUND: Analysis of willingness for postmortem cornea donation by professionals in ophthalmology and their motives in favor of or against donation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 3887 members of the German Ophthalmological Society received an anonymous questionnaire concerning sociodemographic background, physical health, experiences with organ explantation and their former engagement and motives concerning organ and cornea donation. RESULTS: 722 of the questionnaires were partially and 533 completely answered with an average willingness for cornea donation of 79.4%. Significant parameters for cornea donation were gender, former experience with organ explantation, ophthalmological health and fear of false diagnosis of brain death, worse medical treatment or organ commercialization. Of the participants 53.9% suggested the internet as a favorite source of information in this matter. CONCLUSION: The factors which had a significant impact on cornea donation in this survey seem to be mainly a result of insufficient information. Detailed information regarding this topic should preferentially be presented on internet pages of professional societies and could probably increase donation approval of DOG members.
Authors: J W Rey; V Grass; A P Barreiros; N Haberstroh; C Bahnemann; G P Hammer; U Samuel; G Otto; P R Galle; C Werner Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 0.628
Authors: T Pont; R M Gràcia; C Valdés; C Nieto; L Rodellar; I Arancibia; R Deulofeu Vilarnau Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: C E Uhlig; R Koch; J Promesberger; G Hirschfeld; H Schmidt; B Seitz; T Reinhard; D Böhringer Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 3.117