Literature DB >> 20568943

Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy.

Frederick L Stephens1, Correy M Mossop, Randy S Bell, Teodoro Tigno, Michael K Rosner, Anand Kumar, Leon E Moores, Rocco A Armonda.   

Abstract

OBJECT: In support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom-Afghanistan (OEF-A), military neurosurgeons in the combat theater are faced with the daunting task of stabilizing patients in such a way as to prevent irreversible neurological injury from cerebral edema while simultaneously allowing for prolonged transport stateside (5000-7000 miles). It is in this setting that decompressive craniectomy has become a mainstay of far-forward neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). As such, institutional experience with cranioplasty at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) and the National Naval Medical Center (NNMC) has expanded concomitantly. Battlefield blast explosions create cavitary injury zones that often extend beyond the border of the exposed surface wound, and this situation has created unique reconstruction challenges not often seen in civilian TBI. The loss of both soft-tissue and skull base support along with the need for cranial vault reconstruction requires a multidisciplinary approach involving neurosurgery, plastics, oral-maxillofacial surgery, and ophthalmology. With this situation in mind, the authors of this paper endeavored to review the cranial reconstruction complications encountered in these combat-related injuries.
METHODS: A retrospective database review was conducted for all soldiers injured in OIF and OEF-A who had undergone decompressive craniectomy with subsequent cranioplasty between April 2002 and October 2008 at the WRAMC and NNMC. During this time, both facilities received a total of 408 OIF/OEF-A patients with severe head injuries; 188 of these patients underwent decompressive craniectomies in the theater before transfer to the US. Criteria for inclusion in this study consisted of either a closed or a penetrating head injury sustained in combat operations, resulting in the performance of a decompressive craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty at either the WRAMC or NNMC. Excluded from the study were patients for whom primary demographic data could not be verified. Demographic data, indications for craniectomy, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters following cranioplasty, were recorded. Perioperative and postoperative complications were also recorded.
RESULTS: One hundred eight patients (male/female ratio 107:1) met the inclusion criteria for this study, 93 with a penetrating head injury and 15 with a closed head injury. Explosive blast injury was the predominant mechanism of injury, occurring in 72 patients (67%). The average time that elapsed between injury and cranioplasty was 190 days (range 7-546 days). An overall complication rate of 24% was identified. The prevalence of perioperative infection (12%), seizure (7.4%), and extraaxial hematoma formation (7.4%) was noted. Twelve patients (11%) required prosthetic removal because of either extraaxial hematoma formation or infection. Eight of the 13 cases of infection involved cranioplasties performed between 90 and 270 days from the date of injury (p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest to date in which cranioplasty and its complications have been evaluated in a trauma population that underwent decompressive craniectomy. The overall complication rate of 24% is consistent with rates reported in the literature (16-34%); however, the perioperative infection rate of 12% is higher than the rates reported in other studies. This difference is likely related to aspects of the initial injury pattern-such as skull base injury, orbitofacial fractures, sinus injuries, persistent fluid collection, and CSF leakage-which can predispose these patients to infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20568943     DOI: 10.3171/2010.2.FOCUS1026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Recent Revolution in the Design and Manufacture of Cranial Implants: Modern Advancements and Future Directions.

Authors:  David J Bonda; Sunil Manjila; Warren R Selman; David Dean
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David B Kurland; Ariana Khaladj-Ghom; Jesse A Stokum; Brianna Carusillo; Jason K Karimy; Volodymyr Gerzanich; Juan Sahuquillo; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Multidisciplinary approach for improved outcomes in secondary cranial reconstruction: introducing the pericranial-onlay cranioplasty technique.

Authors:  Chad R Gordon; Mark Fisher; Jason Liauw; Ioan Lina; Varun Puvanesarajah; Srinivas Susarla; Alexander Coon; Michael Lim; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Jon Weingart; Geoffrey Colby; Alessandro Olivi; Judy Huang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Epidural fluid collection after cranioplasty : fate and predictive factors.

Authors:  Jung Won Lee; Jae Hoon Kim; Hee In Kang; Byung Gwan Moon; Seung Jin Lee; Joo Seung Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-09-30

5.  Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty.

Authors:  U R Krause-Titz; N Warneke; S Freitag-Wolf; H Barth; H M Mehdorn
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Safe management of paediatric penetrating head injury without a CT scanner: A strategy for humanitarian surgeons based on experience in southern Afghanistan.

Authors:  P Mathew; D M Nott; D Gentleman
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Bone flap necrosis after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction.

Authors:  Christian Ewald; Pedro Duenisch; Jan Walter; Theresa Götz; Otto W Witte; Rolf Kalff; Albrecht Günther
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Decompressive craniectomy bone flap hinged on the temporalis muscle: A new inexpensive use for an old neurosurgical technique.

Authors:  A Olufemi Adeleye; A Luqman Azeez
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-10-18

9.  Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: An institutional audit and analysis of factors related to complications.

Authors:  Zain A Sobani; Muhammad Shahzad Shamim; Syed Nabeel Zafar; Mohsin Qadeer; Najiha Bilal; Syed Ghulam Murtaza; Syed Anther Enam; Muhammad Ehsan Bari
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-17

10.  Immediate, but not delayed, microsurgical skull reconstruction exacerbates brain damage in experimental traumatic brain injury model.

Authors:  Loren E Glover; Naoki Tajiri; Tsz Lau; Yuji Kaneko; Harry van Loveren; Cesario V Borlongan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.