Literature DB >> 9166912

Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements.

Y Paulignan1, V G Frak, I Toni, M Jeannerod.   

Abstract

Prehension movements of the right hand were recorded in normal subjects using a computerized motion analyzer. The kinematics and the spatial paths of markers placed at the wrist and at the tips of the index finger and thumb were measured. Cylindrical objects of different diameters (3, 6, 9 cm) were used as targets. They were placed at six different positions in the workspace along a circle centered on subject's head axis. The positions were spaced by 10 degrees starting from 10 degrees on the left of the sagittal axis, up to 40 degrees on the right. Both the transport and the grasp components of prehension were influenced by the distance between the resting hand position and the object position. Movement time, time to peak velocity of the wrist and time to maximum grip aperture varied as a function of distance from the object, irrespective of its size. The variability of the spatial paths of wrist and fingers sharply decreased during the phase of the movement prior to contact with the object. This indicates that the final position of the thumb and the index finger is a controlled parameter of visuomotor transformation during prehension. The orientation of the opposition axis (defined as the line connecting the tips of the thumb and the index finger at the end of the movement) was measured. Several different frames of reference were used. When an object-centered frame was used, the orientation of the opposition axis was found to change by about 10 degrees from one object position to the next. By contrast, when a body-centered frame was used (with the head or the forearm as a reference), this orientation was found to remain relatively invariant for different object positions and sizes. The degree of wrist flexion was little affected by the position of the object. This result, together with the invariant orientation of the opposition axis, shows that prehension movements aimed at cylindrical objects are organized so as to minimize changes in posture of the lower arm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9166912     DOI: 10.1007/pl00005631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  Effects of accuracy constraints on reach-to-grasp movements in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; V Bracha; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual information gleaned by observing grasping movement in allocentric and egocentric perspectives.

Authors:  Francesco Campanella; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Spatiotemporal distribution of location and object effects in reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Adam G Rouse; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Encoding of coordinated reach and grasp trajectories in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Maryam Saleh; Kazutaka Takahashi; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.

Authors:  Alexandra Grosskopf; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision.

Authors:  Olav Krigolson; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape.

Authors:  Raymond H Cuijpers; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effect of orientation on prehension movement time.

Authors:  Elsje van Bergen; Lisa M van Swieten; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The influence of body posture on the kinematics of prehension in humans and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla).

Authors:  E Reghem; L Chèze; Y Coppens; E Pouydebat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.