Literature DB >> 22198529

Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects.

René Gilster1, Constanze Hesse, Heiner Deubel.   

Abstract

We investigated the choice of contact points during multidigit grasping of different objects. In Experiment 1, cylinders were grasped and lifted. Participants were either instructed as to the number of fingers they should use, ranging from a two-finger grasp to a five-finger grasp, or could grasp with their preferred number of fingers. We found a strong relationship between the position of the fingertips on the object and the number of fingers used. In general, variability in the choice of contact points was low within- as well as between participants. The virtual finger, defined as the geometric mean position of fingers opposing the thumb, was in almost perfect opposition to the thumb, suggesting the formation of a functional unit using all contributing fingers in the grasp. In Experiment 2, four more complex shapes (rectangle, hexagon, pentagon, curved object) were grasped. Although we found some moderate between-participant variability in the choice of contact points, the within-participant variability was again remarkably low. In both experiments, participants showed a strong preference to use four or five fingers during grasping when left with free choice. Taken together, our findings suggest a preplanning of the grasping movement and that grasping results from a coordinated interplay between the fingers contributing to the grasp that cannot be understood as independent digit movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22198529     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2980-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  On achieving strong inference in prehension research.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C P Bertram
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  On taking the grasping out of prehension.

Authors:  K M Newell; P Cesari
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

3.  The scaling of human grip configurations.

Authors:  P Cesari; K M Newell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Body-scaled transitions in human grip configurations.

Authors:  P Cesari; K M Newell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements.

Authors:  A M Wing; S J Lederman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Center of mass perception and inertial frames of reference.

Authors:  G P Bingham; M M Muchisky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11

8.  Body scale and infant grip configurations.

Authors:  K M Newell; P V McDonald; R Baillargeon
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.038

9.  Finger control in the tripod grasp.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci; Luana Caselli; Claudio Secchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hands Holding Clues for Object Recognition in Teachable Machines.

Authors:  Kyungjun Lee; Hernisa Kacorri
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2019-05

2.  The influence of obstacles on grasp planning.

Authors:  Isabelle T Garzorz; Alexander G Knorr; Rene Gilster; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Learned manipulation at unconstrained contacts does not transfer across hands.

Authors:  Qiushi Fu; Jason Y Choi; Andrew M Gordon; Mark Jesunathadas; Marco Santello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Hand pose selection in a bimanual fine-manipulation task.

Authors:  Kunpeng Yao; Dagmar Sternad; Aude Billard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural bases of hand synergies.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Haptic-motor transformations for the control of finger position.

Authors:  Daisuke Shibata; Jason Y Choi; Juan C Laitano; Marco Santello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Two hands are better than one: Perceptual benefits by bimanual movements.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Joris Elshout; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Eye and hand movements disrupt attentional control.

Authors:  Nina Maria Hanning; Luca Wollenberg; Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.