OBJECTIVES: The contraction stress of a silorane-based material and a new low-shrinkage nanohybrid composite were compared to three conventional dimethacrylate-based resin composites using two different measuring systems. It was hypothesized that the silorane-based material and the low-shrinkage nanohybrid composite would exhibit lower contraction stress than dimethacrylate-based composites irrespective of measuring system. METHODS: The materials tested were Filtek Silorane LS (3M ESPE), Venus Diamond (Heraeus Kulzer), Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar Vivadent), Quixfil (Dentsply DeTrey), and Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE). Shrinkage stress was assessed using a stress-strain analyzer consisting of two opposing attachments, one connected to a load sensor and the other fixed to the device, or a system fixed to a universal testing machine with an extensometer as a feedback system. All specimens were light-cured with 20 J/cm(2); the contraction force (N) generated during polymerization was continuously recorded for 300 s. Contraction stress (MPa) was calculated at both 40 s and 300 s. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Venus Diamond exhibited the lowest stress under both experimental conditions. Stress values scored as follows: Venus Diamond<Tetric EvoCeram<Filtek Silorane LS<Quixfil<Filtek Z250 (p<0.05). Stress values measured with the stress-strain analyzer were significantly lower than those measured with the universal testing machine with feedback. SIGNIFICANCE: The hypothesis was partially rejected because only Venus Diamond exhibited the lowest stress values among the tested materials. Contraction stress was higher for all composites when measured in a test system with a feedback. This study confirms that simply reducing the shrinkage does not ensure reduced stress development in composites. Copyright 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: The contraction stress of a silorane-based material and a new low-shrinkage nanohybrid composite were compared to three conventional dimethacrylate-based resin composites using two different measuring systems. It was hypothesized that the silorane-based material and the low-shrinkage nanohybrid composite would exhibit lower contraction stress than dimethacrylate-based composites irrespective of measuring system. METHODS: The materials tested were Filtek Silorane LS (3M ESPE), Venus Diamond (Heraeus Kulzer), Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar Vivadent), Quixfil (Dentsply DeTrey), and Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE). Shrinkage stress was assessed using a stress-strain analyzer consisting of two opposing attachments, one connected to a load sensor and the other fixed to the device, or a system fixed to a universal testing machine with an extensometer as a feedback system. All specimens were light-cured with 20 J/cm(2); the contraction force (N) generated during polymerization was continuously recorded for 300 s. Contraction stress (MPa) was calculated at both 40 s and 300 s. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Venus Diamond exhibited the lowest stress under both experimental conditions. Stress values scored as follows: Venus Diamond<Tetric EvoCeram<Filtek Silorane LS<Quixfil<Filtek Z250 (p<0.05). Stress values measured with the stress-strain analyzer were significantly lower than those measured with the universal testing machine with feedback. SIGNIFICANCE: The hypothesis was partially rejected because only Venus Diamond exhibited the lowest stress values among the tested materials. Contraction stress was higher for all composites when measured in a test system with a feedback. This study confirms that simply reducing the shrinkage does not ensure reduced stress development in composites. Copyright 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Prashanthi Sampath Madhyastha; Dilip G Naik; Ravindra Kotian; Divya Padma; N Srikant; Kumar M R Bhat Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2015-01-01