Literature DB >> 25738076

Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Silorane and Methacrylate based Dental Composites using Human Gingival Fibroblasts.

Prashanthi Sampath Madhyastha1, Dilip G Naik2, Ravindra Kotian3, Divya Padma4, N Srikant5, Kumar M R Bhat6.   

Abstract

AIM: The effects of leached substances from the restorative dental materials may induce local and systemic adverse effects. Thus the biological and toxic properties of the restorative dental materials must be compatible with the oral tissues or with general health. Therefore, the need for biocompatible restorative dental material implies the necessity of toxicity testing. It was the purpose of this investigation to determine and compare the possible toxic effect of silorane based composite (Filtek P90) on human gingival fibroblast (HGF) in vitro using cytotoxicity measuring parameters (MTT assay) in comparison with its methacrylate counterpart (Z100) for their viability, proliferation rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fresh healthy biopsy specimens of human gingival tissue of patients were obtained. For HGF, cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium and grown to sub confluent monolayers. After attaining confluence, cells were treated with different doses of the Filtek P90 or Z 100 for different time point. HGF cells were observed for their proliferation, viability by MTT assay.
RESULTS: The results of the cytotoxicity assay showed that, the percentage of viable cells was very good in the first 24h and marginally decreased in the next 48h period in all groups. However, the proliferation rate was never below 84% in all the groups, at any given concentration. Filtek P90 and Z100 treated cells exhibited insignificant decrease in the cell proliferation both in 24h and 48h exposure when compared to significant decrease in the cell survival rate in the positive control (Mitomycin C 250 μg/ml).) Comparison of the toxicity between Filtek P90 and Z100 in 24h &amp; 48h separately showed that there was no significant difference (p<0.05) between these two composites in 24h and 48h' time period at all concentrations of the composites.
CONCLUSION: To conclude, the new silorane based restorative composite showed comparable cytotoxic characteristics to clinically successful dimethacrylate composites suggesting the non-toxic nature in the oral environment and hence contributing to clinical success of these new restorative materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytotoxicity; Human gingival fibroblasts; MTT Assay; Methacrylate-based composites; Silorane-based composites

Year:  2015        PMID: 25738076      PMCID: PMC4347167          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10269.5366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  29 in total

1.  Cultured pulp fibroblasts: are they suitable for in vitro cytotoxicity testing?

Authors:  C W van Wyk; A Olivier; J S Maritz
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.253

2.  The influence of short and medium-term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrink dental composites.

Authors:  W M Palin; G J P Fleming; F J T Burke; P M Marquis; R C Randall
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Skin and mucosal reactions associated with dental materials.

Authors:  A Hensten-Pettersen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.612

4.  Stability of silorane dental monomers in aqueous systems.

Authors:  J David Eick; Robert E Smith; Charles S Pinzino; Elisabet L Kostoryz
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Siloranes in dental composites.

Authors:  Wolfgang Weinmann; Christoph Thalacker; Rainer Guggenberger
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Elution of substances from a silorane-based dental composite.

Authors:  Hilde M Kopperud; Malene Schmidt; Inger S Kleven
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.612

7.  Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements.

Authors:  A Schedle; A Franz; X Rausch-Fan; A Spittler; T Lucas; P Samorapoompichit; W Sperr; G Boltz-Nitulescu
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Exploring beyond methacrylates.

Authors:  R Guggenberger; W Weinmann
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.522

9.  Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer.

Authors:  J David Eick; Shiva P Kotha; Cecil C Chappelow; Kathleen V Kilway; Gregory J Giese; Alan G Glaros; Charles S Pinzino
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Cytotoxic effects of packable and nonpackable dental composites.

Authors:  Alexander Franz; Franz König; Margit Anglmayer; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Gabriele Gille; Wolf Dieter Rausch; Trevor Lucas; Wolfgang Sperr; Andreas Schedle
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of various light curing times on the elution of composite components.

Authors:  Christof Högg; Moritz Maier; Katherina Dettinger-Maier; Xiuli He; Lena Rothmund; Kai Kehe; Reinhard Hickel; Franz-Xaver Reichl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Cytotoxicity and cytokine expression induced by silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins.

Authors:  Daniele Lucca Longo; Francisco Wanderley Garcia Paula-Silva; Lucia Helena Faccioli; Patrícia Maria Gatón-Hernández; Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.