Literature DB >> 18033765

Neural correlates of availability and accessibility in memory.

Reza Habib1, Lars Nyberg.   

Abstract

Failure to remember can be due to not having information available in memory or to an inability to access information that is available. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine brain responses during encoding and successive cued recall and associative recognition tests of paired associates. Items were classified into 3 categories based on performance on the 2 retrieval tests: 1) successfully remembered (both recalled and recognized), 2) inaccessible (not recalled but later recognized), and 3) forgotten (neither recalled nor recognized). During cued recall, availability in memory was signaled in a network of regions including bilateral medial temporal lobe, left middle temporal cortex, and the parietal cortex. Memory access resulted in heightened activity in these regions as well as in left inferior frontal cortex. Encoding-related activity in hippocampus and inferior temporal cortex predicted subsequent availability and left inferior frontal activity predicted subsequent access. These results suggest that failure to access information that is available in memory may reflect weaker memory representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18033765     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  17 in total

1.  Overlap between the neural correlates of cued recall and source memory: evidence for a generic recollection network?

Authors:  Hiroki R Hayama; Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Acute alcohol effects on narrative recall and contextual memory: an examination of fragmentary blackouts.

Authors:  Reagan R Wetherill; Kim Fromme
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Distractibility during episodic retrieval is exacerbated by perturbation of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Olivia Y Kim; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Selectivity in Postencoding Connectivity with High-Level Visual Cortex Is Associated with Reward-Motivated Memory.

Authors:  Vishnu P Murty; Alexa Tompary; R Alison Adcock; Lila Davachi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Glucose, relational memory, and the hippocampus.

Authors:  Brian Stollery; Leonie Christian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition.

Authors:  Laura Mickes; Emily M Johnson; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Signatures of Memory: Brain Coactivations during Retrieval Distinguish Correct from Incorrect Recollection.

Authors:  Avi Mendelsohn; Orit Furman; Yadin Dudai
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Developmental differences in the neural correlates of relational encoding and recall in children: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  O Evren Güler; Kathleen M Thomas
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Genetic Analysis of Association Between Calcium Signaling and Hippocampal Activation, Memory Performance in the Young and Old, and Risk for Sporadic Alzheimer Disease.

Authors:  Angela Heck; Matthias Fastenrath; David Coynel; Bianca Auschra; Horst Bickel; Virginie Freytag; Leo Gschwind; Francina Hartmann; Frank Jessen; Hanna Kaduszkiewicz; Wolfgang Maier; Annette Milnik; Michael Pentzek; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Klara Spalek; Christian Vogler; Michael Wagner; Siegfried Weyerer; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Dominique J-F de Quervain; Andreas Papassotiropoulos
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 21.596

10.  Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: an fMRI study of the testing effect.

Authors:  Erik A Wing; Elizabeth J Marsh; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.