Literature DB >> 20565183

Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes.

Lorne Campbell1, Jeffry A Simpson, Jennifer G Boldry, Harris Rubin.   

Abstract

Little is known about why some people experience greater temporal fluctuations of relationship perceptions over short periods of time, or how these fluctuations within individuals are associated with relational processes that can destabilize relationships. Two studies were conducted to address these questions. In Study 1, long-term dating partners completed a 14-day diary study that assessed each partner's daily partner and relationship perceptions. Following the diary phase, each couple was videotaped trying to resolve the most important unresolved problem from the diary period. As predicted, (a) individuals who trusted their partners less reported greater variability in perceptions of relationship quality across the diary period; (b) they also perceived daily relationship-based conflict as a relatively more negative experience; and (c) greater variability in relationship perceptions predicted greater self-reported distress, more negative behavior, and less positive behavior during a postdiary conflict resolution task (rated by observers). The diary results were conceptually replicated in Study 2a, in which older cohabiting couples completed a 21-day diary. These same participants also took part in a reaction-time decision-making study (Study 2b), which revealed that individuals tend to compartmentalize positive and negative features of their partners if they (individuals) experienced greater variability in relationship quality during the 21-day diary period and were involved in higher quality relationships. These findings advance researchers' understanding of trust in intimate relationships and provide some insight into how temporal fluctuations in relationship quality may undermine relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20565183     DOI: 10.1037/a0019714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  12 in total

1.  Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies.

Authors:  Samantha Joel; Paul W Eastwick; Colleen J Allison; Ximena B Arriaga; Zachary G Baker; Eran Bar-Kalifa; Sophie Bergeron; Gurit E Birnbaum; Rebecca L Brock; Claudia C Brumbaugh; Cheryl L Carmichael; Serena Chen; Jennifer Clarke; Rebecca J Cobb; Michael K Coolsen; Jody Davis; David C de Jong; Anik Debrot; Eva C DeHaas; Jaye L Derrick; Jami Eller; Marie-Joelle Estrada; Ruddy Faure; Eli J Finkel; R Chris Fraley; Shelly L Gable; Reuma Gadassi-Polack; Yuthika U Girme; Amie M Gordon; Courtney L Gosnell; Matthew D Hammond; Peggy A Hannon; Cheryl Harasymchuk; Wilhelm Hofmann; Andrea B Horn; Emily A Impett; Jeremy P Jamieson; Dacher Keltner; James J Kim; Jeffrey L Kirchner; Esther S Kluwer; Madoka Kumashiro; Grace Larson; Gal Lazarus; Jill M Logan; Laura B Luchies; Geoff MacDonald; Laura V Machia; Michael R Maniaci; Jessica A Maxwell; Moran Mizrahi; Amy Muise; Sylvia Niehuis; Brian G Ogolsky; C Rebecca Oldham; Nickola C Overall; Meinrad Perrez; Brett J Peters; Paula R Pietromonaco; Sally I Powers; Thery Prok; Rony Pshedetzky-Shochat; Eshkol Rafaeli; Erin L Ramsdell; Maija Reblin; Michael Reicherts; Alan Reifman; Harry T Reis; Galena K Rhoades; William S Rholes; Francesca Righetti; Lindsey M Rodriguez; Ron Rogge; Natalie O Rosen; Darby Saxbe; Haran Sened; Jeffry A Simpson; Erica B Slotter; Scott M Stanley; Shevaun Stocker; Cathy Surra; Hagar Ter Kuile; Allison A Vaughn; Amanda M Vicary; Mariko L Visserman; Scott Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; Rebecca T Pinkus; John G Holmes; Brianna Harris; Sarah Gomillion; Maya Aloni; Jaye L Derrick; Sadie Leder
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-09

3.  Household Income and Trajectories of Marital Satisfaction in Early Marriage.

Authors:  Grace L Jackson; Jennifer L Krull; Thomas N Bradbury; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2017-01-31

4.  The Price of Distrust: Trust, Anxious Attachment, Jealousy, and Partner Abuse.

Authors:  Lindsey M Rodriguez; Angelo M DiBello; Camilla S Øverup; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  Partner Abuse       Date:  2015-07

5.  Women and Men are the Barometers of Relationships: Testing the Predictive Power of Women's and Men's Relationship Satisfaction.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Justin A Lavner; Amy Muise; Marcus Mund; Franz J Neyer; Yoobin Park; Cheryl Harasymchuk; Emily A Impett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Fluctuation in Relationship Quality Over Time and Individual Well-Being: Main, Mediated, and Moderated Effects.

Authors:  Sarah W Whitton; Galena K Rhoades; Mark A Whisman
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-04-11

7.  Ego depletion decreases trust in economic decision making.

Authors:  Sarah E Ainsworth; Roy F Baumeister; Kathleen D Vohs; Dan Ariely
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-09-01

8.  Cautious to a Fault: Self-Protection and the Trajectory of Marital Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; John G Holmes; Jaye L Derrick; Brianna Harris; Dale W Griffin; Rebecca T Pinkus
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-05

9.  Daily positive spillover and crossover from mothers' work to youth health.

Authors:  Katie M Lawson; Kelly D Davis; Susan M McHale; Leslie B Hammer; Orfeu M Buxton
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2014-09-22

10.  Role of the right temporoparietal junction in intergroup bias in trust decisions.

Authors:  Junya Fujino; Shisei Tei; Takashi Itahashi; Yuta Y Aoki; Haruhisa Ohta; Manabu Kubota; Ryu-Ichiro Hashimoto; Hidehiko Takahashi; Nobumasa Kato; Motoaki Nakamura
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.