Literature DB >> 35939691

Women and Men are the Barometers of Relationships: Testing the Predictive Power of Women's and Men's Relationship Satisfaction.

Matthew D Johnson1, Justin A Lavner2, Amy Muise3, Marcus Mund4, Franz J Neyer5, Yoobin Park6, Cheryl Harasymchuk7, Emily A Impett8.   

Abstract

There is a longstanding belief in relationship science and popular opinion that women are the barometers in mixed-gender relationships such that their perceptions about the partnership carry more weight than men's in predicting future relationship satisfaction, but this idea has yet to be rigorously tested. We analyze data from two studies to test within-person links between men's and women's relationship satisfaction on their own and their partner's next-day and next-year satisfaction. Study 1 combined nine daily diary datasets from Canada and the United States with 901 mixed-gender couples who provided 29,541 daily reports of relationship satisfaction. Study 2 analyzed five annual waves of data from the German Family Panel (pairfam) that surveyed 3,405 mixed-gender couples who provided 21,115 relationship satisfaction reports. Latent curve models with structured residuals (LCM-SR) revealed that in both studies, men's and women's relationship satisfaction significantly predicted their own and their partner's relationship satisfaction, with no gender differences in the magnitude of these effects. Results underscore the interdependence of romantic partners' satisfaction and indicate that both men and women jointly shape romantic relationship satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  couples; daily diary; gender differences; longitudinal; relationship satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35939691      PMCID: PMC9388139          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2209460119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  14 in total

Review 1.  The gender similarities hypothesis.

Authors:  Janet Shibley Hyde
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005-09

Review 2.  Adolescent romantic relationships.

Authors:  W Andrew Collins; Deborah P Welsh; Wyndol Furman
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Coregulation in Romantic Partners' Attachment Styles: A Longitudinal Investigation.

Authors:  Nathan W Hudson; R Chris Fraley; Claudia Chloe Brumbaugh; Amanda M Vicary
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-04-17

4.  Observational biases in spouse observation: toward a cognitive/behavioral model of marriage.

Authors:  F J Floyd; H J Markman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1983-06

5.  Exploring the Link Between Daily Relationship Quality, Sexual Desire, and Sexual Activity in Couples.

Authors:  Marieke Dewitte; Axel Mayer
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2018-03-01

6.  Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes.

Authors:  Lorne Campbell; Jeffry A Simpson; Jennifer G Boldry; Harris Rubin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-07

7.  Partner Support and Connection Protect Couples During Pregnancy: A Daily Diary Investigation.

Authors:  Shaina A Kumar; Rebecca L Brock; David DiLillo
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2021-09-01

8.  The separation of between-person and within-person components of individual change over time: a latent curve model with structured residuals.

Authors:  Patrick J Curran; Andrea L Howard; Sierra A Bainter; Stephanie T Lane; James S McGinley
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-12-23

9.  Integrative data analysis: the simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets.

Authors:  Patrick J Curran; Andrea M Hussong
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-06

10.  How both partners' individual differences, stress, and behavior predict change in relationship satisfaction: Extending the VSA model.

Authors:  James K McNulty; Andrea L Meltzer; Lisa A Neff; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.