Literature DB >> 20562623

Relationship between speech perception in noise and phonological awareness skills for children with normal hearing.

Dawna Lewis1, Brenda Hoover, Sangsook Choi, Patricia Stelmachowicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Speech perception difficulties experienced by children in adverse listening environments have been well documented. It has been suggested that phonological awareness may be related to children's ability to understand speech in noise. The goal of this study was to provide data that will allow a clearer characterization of this potential relation in typically developing children. Doing so may result in a better understanding of how children learn to listen in noise as well as providing information to identify children who are at risk for difficulties listening in noise.
DESIGN: Thirty-six children (5 to 7 yrs) with normal hearing participated in the study. Three phonological awareness tasks (syllable counting, initial consonant same, and phoneme deletion), representing a range of skills, were administered. For perception in noise tasks, nonsense syllables, monosyllabic words, and meaningful sentences with three key words were presented (50 dB SPL) at three signal to noise ratios (0, +5, and +10 dB).
RESULTS: Among the speech in noise tasks, there was a significant effect of signal to noise ratio, with children performing less well at 0-dB signal to noise ratio for all stimuli. A significant age effect occurred only for word recognition, with 7-yr-olds scoring significantly higher than 5-yr olds. For all three phonological awareness tasks, an age effect existed with 7-year-olds again performing significantly better than 5-yr-olds. However, when examining the relation between speech recognition in noise and phonological awareness skills, no single variable accounted for a significant part of the variance in performance on nonsense syllables, words, or sentences. However, there was an association between vocabulary knowledge and speech perception in noise.
CONCLUSIONS: Although phonological awareness skills are strongly related to reading and some children with reading difficulties also demonstrate poor speech perception in noise, results of this study question a relation between phonological awareness skills and speech perception in moderate levels of noise for typically developing children with normal hearing from 5 to 7 yrs of age. Further research in this area is needed to examine possible relations among the many factors that affect both speech perception in noise and the development of phonological awareness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20562623      PMCID: PMC3358133          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e5d188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  42 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting speech interference in classrooms.

Authors:  M Picard; J S Bradley
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Language deficits in dyslexic children: speech perception, phonology, and morphology.

Authors:  M F Joanisse; F R Manis; P Keating; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2000-09

4.  The influence of phonemic awareness development on acoustic cue weighting strategies in children's speech perception.

Authors:  Catherine Mayo; James M Scobbie; Nigel Hewlett; Daphne Waters
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise.

Authors:  C E Johnson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble.

Authors:  M Fallon; S E Trehub; B A Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Children's detection of pure-tone signals with random multitone maskers.

Authors:  E L Oh; F Wightman; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Performance-intensity functions for normal-hearing adults and children using computer-aided speech perception assessment.

Authors:  Ryan McCreery; Rindy Ito; Merry Spratford; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The role of early language experience in the development of speech perception and phonological processing abilities: evidence from 5-year-olds with histories of otitis media with effusion and low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Lisa Thuente Burton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Children's detection of pure-tone signals: informational masking with contralateral maskers.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Michael R Callahan; Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Eunmi Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Eric Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein; Caitlin Rice; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Individual differences in speech-in-noise perception parallel neural speech processing and attention in preschoolers.

Authors:  Elaine C Thompson; Kali Woodruff Carr; Travis White-Schwoch; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory brainstem measures predict reading and speech-in-noise perception in school-aged children.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Steve Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Cortical-evoked potentials reflect speech-in-noise perception in children.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Neural Encoding of Speech and Music: Implications for Hearing Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2011-05-01

6.  Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Adrian L Taylor; Linsey W Sunderhaus; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Restoration and Efficiency of the Neural Processing of Continuous Speech Are Promoted by Prior Knowledge.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes Constantino; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31

9.  Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children's ability to perceive speech in noise.

Authors:  Elaine C Thompson; Jennifer Krizman; Travis White-Schwoch; Trent Nicol; Ryne Estabrook; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.464

10.  Changes of Temporal Processing and Hearing in Noise after Use of a Monoaural Hearing Aid in Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Yehree Kim; Chan Joo Yang; Myung Hoon Yoo; Chan Il Song; Jong Woo Chung
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2021-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.