Literature DB >> 14973109

Current research promises and challenges in behavioral oncology: report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology annual meeting, 2002.

Suzanne M Miller1, Deborah J Bowen, Marci K Campbell, Michael A Diefenbach, Ellen R Gritz, Paul B Jacobsen, Michael Stefanek, Carolyn Y Fang, DeAnn Lazovich, Kerry A Sherman, Catharine Wang.   

Abstract

The Behavioral Oncology Interest Group of the American Society of Preventive Oncology held a Roundtable session on March 10, 2002, at the American Society of Preventive Oncology annual meeting in Bethesda, Maryland, to discuss the current state-of-the-science in behavioral approaches to cancer prevention and control and to delineate priorities for additional research. Four key areas were considered: (a) behavioral approaches to cancer genetic risk assessment and testing; (b) biological mechanisms of psychosocial effects on cancer; (c) the role of risk perceptions in cancer screening adherence; and (d) the impact of tailored and targeted interventions on cancer prevention and control research. The evidence reviewed indicates that behavioral approaches have made significant contributions to cancer prevention and control research. At the same time, there is a need to more closely link future investigations to the underlying base of behavioral science principles and paradigms that guide them. To successfully bridge the gap between the availability of effective new cancer prevention and control technologies and the participants they are meant to serve will require the development of more integrative conceptual models, the incorporation of more rigorous methodological designs, and more precise identification of the individual and group characteristics of the groups under study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14973109     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-463-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  9 in total

1.  Objective and subjective breast cancer risk: relationships with natural killer cell activity and psychological distress in healthy women.

Authors:  Na-Jin Park; Duck-Hee Kang; Michael T Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Health-related quality of life, lifestyle behaviors, and intervention preferences of survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Joya Chandra; Raheem J Paxton; Joann L Ater; Diana Urbauer; Cody Scott Cruz; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  An Internet method to assess cancer patient information needs and enhance doctor-patient communication: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joanne S Buzaglo; Jennifer L Millard; Caroline G Ridgway; Eric A Ross; Susan P Antaramian; Suzanne M Miller; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Cognitive and affective influences on perceived risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Frances McCarty; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan L Rodriguez; Lawrence E Scholl; Steven Leadbetter
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Advancing the evidence base in cancer: psychosocial multicenter trials.

Authors:  Robert Sanson-Fisher; Lisa Mackenzie; Phyllis Butow; Nicole Rankin; Christine Paul
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Reducing the cancer burden of lifestyle factors: opportunities and challenges of the Internet.

Authors:  Amanda L Graham; David B Abrams
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Psychosocial approaches to participation in BRCA1/2 genetic risk assessment among African American women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Laura-Kate Shaw; Karen Cavanagh; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-08-10

8.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Kathryn I Pollak; Catherine Rehder; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer H Crow; Michael Datto
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Effectiveness of different methods for delivering tailored nutrition education to low income, ethnically diverse adults.

Authors:  Kim M Gans; Patricia M Risica; Leslie O Strolla; Leanne Fournier; Usree Kirtania; David Upegui; Julie Zhao; Tiffiney George; Suddhasatta Acharyya
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 6.457

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.