Literature DB >> 20561602

Effects of the architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds on cell seeding and culturing.

Ferry P W Melchels1, Ana M C Barradas, Clemens A van Blitterswijk, Jan de Boer, Jan Feijen, Dirk W Grijpma.   

Abstract

The advance of rapid prototyping techniques has significantly improved control over the pore network architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds. In this work, we have assessed the influence of scaffold pore architecture on cell seeding and static culturing, by comparing a computer designed gyroid architecture fabricated by stereolithography with a random pore architecture resulting from salt leaching. The scaffold types showed comparable porosity and pore size values, but the gyroid type showed a more than 10-fold higher permeability due to the absence of size-limiting pore interconnections. The higher permeability significantly improved the wetting properties of the hydrophobic scaffolds and increased the settling speed of cells upon static seeding of immortalised mesenchymal stem cells. After dynamic seeding followed by 5 days of static culture gyroid scaffolds showed large cell populations in the centre of the scaffold, while salt-leached scaffolds were covered with a cell sheet on the outside and no cells were found in the scaffold centre. It was shown that interconnectivity of the pores and permeability of the scaffold prolonged the time of static culture before overgrowth of cells at the scaffold periphery occurred. Furthermore, novel scaffold designs are proposed to further improve the transport of oxygen and nutrients throughout the scaffolds and to create tissue engineering grafts with a designed, pre-fabricated vasculature.
Copyright © 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20561602     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  50 in total

1.  Effects of designed PLLA and 50:50 PLGA scaffold architectures on bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  Eiji Saito; Elly E Liao; Wei-Wen Hu; Paul H Krebsbach; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.963

2.  Engineered microporosity: enhancing the early regenerative potential of decellularized temporomandibular joint discs.

Authors:  Cassandra M Juran; M Franklin Dolwick; Peter S McFetridge
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  The fabrication of cryogel scaffolds incorporated with poloxamer 407 for potential use in the regeneration of the nucleus pulposus.

Authors:  Nicholas A Temofeew; Katherine R Hixon; Sarah H McBride-Gagyi; Scott A Sell
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Effect of scaffold architecture and BMP-2/BMP-7 delivery on in vitro bone regeneration.

Authors:  Pinar Yilgor; Rui A Sousa; Rui L Reis; Nesrin Hasirci; Vasif Hasirci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Rapid prototyping amphiphilic polymer/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with hydration-induced self-fixation behavior.

Authors:  Artem B Kutikov; Anvesh Gurijala; Jie Song
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 6.  Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.389

7.  A nanofibrous electrospun patch to maintain human mesenchymal cell stemness.

Authors:  L Pandolfi; N Toledano Furman; Xin Wang; C Lupo; J O Martinez; M Mohamed; F Taraballi; E Tasciotti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography.

Authors:  Robert Gauvin; Ying-Chieh Chen; Jin Woo Lee; Pranav Soman; Pinar Zorlutuna; Jason W Nichol; Hojae Bae; Shaochen Chen; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  3D printing for the design and fabrication of polymer-based gradient scaffolds.

Authors:  Laura G Bracaglia; Brandon T Smith; Emma Watson; Navein Arumugasaamy; Antonios G Mikos; John P Fisher
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Innovative approach for the in vitro research on biomedical scaffolds designed and customized with CAD-CAM technology.

Authors:  Massimo Marrelli; Antonella Pujia; Francesca Palmieri; Roberto Gatto; Giovanni Falisi; Marco Gargari; Silvia Caruso; Davide Apicella; Claudio Rastelli; Gianna Maria Nardi; Francesco Paduano; Marco Tatullo
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.