Literature DB >> 22162220

Effects of designed PLLA and 50:50 PLGA scaffold architectures on bone formation in vivo.

Eiji Saito1, Elly E Liao, Wei-Wen Hu, Paul H Krebsbach, Scott J Hollister.   

Abstract

Biodegradable porous scaffolds have been investigated as an alternative approach to current metal, ceramic, and polymer bone graft substitutes for lost or damaged bone tissues. Although there have been many studies investigating the effects of scaffold architecture on bone formation, many of these scaffolds were fabricated using conventional methods such as salt leaching and phase separation, and were constructed without designed architecture. To study the effects of both designed architecture and material on bone formation, this study designed and fabricated three types of porous scaffold architecture from two biodegradable materials, poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) and 50:50 Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), using image based design and indirect solid freeform fabrication techniques, seeded them with bone morphogenetic protein-7 transduced human gingival fibroblasts, and implanted them subcutaneously into mice for 4 and 8 weeks. Micro-computed tomography data confirmed that the fabricated porous scaffolds replicated the designed architectures. Histological analysis revealed that the 50:50 PLGA scaffolds degraded but did not maintain their architecture after 4 weeks implantation. However, PLLA scaffolds maintained their architecture at both time points and showed improved bone ingrowth, which followed the internal architecture of the scaffolds. Mechanical properties of both PLLA and 50:50 PLGA scaffolds decreased but PLLA scaffolds maintained greater mechanical properties than 50:50 PLGA after implantation. The increase of mineralized tissue helped support the mechanical properties of bone tissue and scaffold constructs between 4-8 weeks. The results indicate the importance of choice of scaffold materials and computationally designed scaffolds to control tissue formation and mechanical properties for desired bone tissue regeneration.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22162220      PMCID: PMC4367810          DOI: 10.1002/term.497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  66 in total

1.  Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R D Maddox; J M Taboas
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity.

Authors:  Cheng Yu Lin; Noboru Kikuchi; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Cyclic mechanical compression increases mineralization of cell-seeded polymer scaffolds in vivo.

Authors:  Angel O Duty; Megan E Oest; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Bone morphogenetic proteins in tissue engineering: the road from the laboratory to the clinic, part I (basic concepts).

Authors:  P C Bessa; M Casal; R L Reis
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.963

5.  Ectopic bone formation by marrow stromal osteoblast transplantation using poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foams implanted into the rat mesentery.

Authors:  S L Ishaug-Riley; G M Crane; A Gurlek; M J Miller; A W Yasko; M J Yaszemski; A G Mikos
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-07

6.  An image-based approach for designing and manufacturing craniofacial scaffolds.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R A Levy; T M Chu; J W Halloran; S E Feinberg
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Gene therapy for bone formation: in vitro and in vivo osteogenic activity of an adenovirus expressing BMP7.

Authors:  R T Franceschi; D Wang; P H Krebsbach; R B Rutherford
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 8.  Orthopaedic applications for PLA-PGA biodegradable polymers.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; C M Agrawal; F A Barber; S S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  A study on the in vitro degradation properties of poly(L-lactic acid)/beta-tricalcuim phosphate (PLLA/beta-TCP) scaffold under dynamic loading.

Authors:  Yunqing Kang; Yadong Yao; Guangfu Yin; Zhongbing Huang; Xiaoming Liao; Xiujuan Xu; Guanxiu Zhao
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Calvarial bone repair with porous D,L-polylactide.

Authors:  B P Robinson; J O Hollinger; E H Szachowicz; J Brekke
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  13 in total

1.  Hierarchical polymeric scaffolds support the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Rosa Akbarzadeh; Joshua A Minton; Cara S Janney; Tyler A Smith; Paul F James; Azizeh-Mitra Yousefi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Multigrowth Factor Delivery via Immobilization of Gene Therapy Vectors.

Authors:  Jie Hao; Kenneth C K Cheng; Laura G Kruger; Lena Larsson; James V Sugai; Joerg Lahann; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Nano-ceramic composite scaffolds for bioreactor-based bone engineering.

Authors:  Qing Lv; Meng Deng; Bret D Ulery; Lakshmi S Nair; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cultivation of hierarchical 3D scaffolds inside a perfusion bioreactor: scaffold design and finite-element analysis of fluid flow.

Authors:  Kaylie Sampson; Songmi Koo; Carter Gadola; Anastasiia Vasiukhina; Aditya Singh; Alexandra Spartano; Rachana Gollapudi; Matthew Duley; Jens Mueller; Paul F James; Amy M Yousefi
Journal:  SN Appl Sci       Date:  2021-11-24

5.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Bone Extracellular Matrix for Craniofacial Regeneration.

Authors:  Ben P Hung; Bilal A Naved; Ethan L Nyberg; Miguel Dias; Christina A Holmes; Jennifer H Elisseeff; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-18

6.  Use of micro-computed tomography to nondestructively characterize biomineral coatings on solid freeform fabricated poly (L-lactic acid) and poly ((ε-caprolactone) scaffolds in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Eiji Saito; Darilis Suarez-Gonzalez; Rameshwar R Rao; Jan P Stegemann; William L Murphy; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 7.  Microcomputed tomography: approaches and applications in bioengineering.

Authors:  Joel D Boerckel; Devon E Mason; Anna M McDermott; Eben Alsberg
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 6.832

8.  Reconstruction of Large-scale Defects with a Novel Hybrid Scaffold Made from Poly(L-lactic acid)/Nanohydroxyapatite/Alendronate-loaded Chitosan Microsphere: in vitro and in vivo Studies.

Authors:  Hongwei Wu; Pengfei Lei; Gengyan Liu; Yu Shrike Zhang; Jingzhou Yang; Longbo Zhang; Jie Xie; Wanting Niu; Hua Liu; Jianming Ruan; Yihe Hu; Chaoyue Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Preclinical in vivo Performance of Novel Biodegradable, Electrospun Poly(lactic acid) and Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Nanocomposites: A Review.

Authors:  Claudia Holderegger; Patrick R Schmidlin; Franz E Weber; Dirk Mohn
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  The effects of poly L-lactic acid nanofiber scaffold on mouse spermatogonial stem cell culture.

Authors:  Neda Eslahi; Mahmoud Reza Hadjighassem; Mohammad Taghi Joghataei; Tooba Mirzapour; Mehrdad Bakhtiyari; Malak Shakeri; Vahid Pirhajati; Peymaneh Shirinbayan; Morteza Koruji
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.