Literature DB >> 20559331

Optometrists referrals for glaucoma assessment: a prospective survey of clinical data and outcomes.

A J Lockwood1, J F Kirwan, Z Ashleigh.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the outcomes following referral for glaucoma from routine optometric practice and the positive predictive value (PPV).
METHODS: A prospective study of 441 referrals for glaucoma in the Portsmouth area was performed over 6 months. A positive outcome was defined when the patient had the diagnosis of glaucoma made or if there was a high index of suspicion of glaucoma requiring follow-up. The PPV was determined from positive outcome number/referral number.
RESULTS: The overall PPV was 0.37 (95% confidence interval 0.33-0.42). Open-angle glaucoma (OAG) was confirmed in 33 (7%) patients. A diagnosis of ocular hypertension was made in 49 (11%) patients and glaucoma suspect in 92 (21%) referrals. Two-thirds of optometrists recorded all 3 assessments: fields, intraocular pressure (IOP) and disc appearance, a figure representing 293 referrals (PPV 0.37). However the greatest referral accuracy was seen when only discs and IOPs were recorded (PPV 0.47). When all three tests were given as reasons for suspicion for glaucoma, the PPV was 0.71. The number of patients diagnosed with OAG from Portsea Island during the study period was 7, whereas the expected number of diagnosed patients was 29.
CONCLUSION: Wider use of perimetry by optometrists and increased reporting of all three tests has not led to an increase in PPV. There remain a considerable number of undiagnosed patients with glaucoma in the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20559331     DOI: 10.1038/eye.2010.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of an AI system for the automated detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs: the European Optic Disc Assessment Study.

Authors:  Thomas W Rogers; Nicolas Jaccard; Francis Carbonaro; Hans G Lemij; Koenraad A Vermeer; Nicolaas J Reus; Sameer Trikha
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Portsmouth visual field database: an audit of glaucoma progression.

Authors:  J F Kirwan; A Hustler; H Bobat; L Toms; D P Crabb; A I McNaught
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?

Authors:  S Trikha; C Macgregor; M Jeffery; J Kirwan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Glaucoma and intraocular pressure in EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Michelle P Y Chan; David C Broadway; Anthony P Khawaja; Jennifer L Y Yip; David F Garway-Heath; Jennifer M Burr; Robert Luben; Shabina Hayat; Nichola Dalzell; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paul J Foster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-09-13

5.  Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice.

Authors:  Kam Chun Ho; Fiona Stapleton; Louise Wiles; Peter Hibbert; Sally Alkhawajah; Andrew White; Isabelle Jalbert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.