Thomas W Rogers1, Nicolas Jaccard2, Francis Carbonaro3, Hans G Lemij4, Koenraad A Vermeer4, Nicolaas J Reus4,5, Sameer Trikha2,6. 1. Visulytix Ltd, Screenworks, Highbury Grove, Highbury East, London, N5 2EF, UK. tom@visulytix.com. 2. Visulytix Ltd, Screenworks, Highbury Grove, Highbury East, London, N5 2EF, UK. 3. Mater Dei Hospital, Triq Dun Karm, L'Imsida, Malta. 4. Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Amphia Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Breda, The Netherlands. 6. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning based Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs, and to compare this performance to the performance of a large cohort of ophthalmologists and optometrists. METHODS: A retrospective study evaluating the diagnostic performance of an AI software (Pegasus v1.0, Visulytix Ltd., London UK) and comparing it with that of 243 European ophthalmologists and 208 British optometrists, as determined in previous studies, for the detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy from 94 scanned stereoscopic photographic slides scanned into digital format. RESULTS: Pegasus was able to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy with an accuracy of 83.4% (95% CI: 77.5-89.2). This is comparable to an average ophthalmologist accuracy of 80.5% (95% CI: 67.2-93.8) and average optometrist accuracy of 80% (95% CI: 67-88) on the same images. In addition, the AI system had an intra-observer agreement (Cohen's Kappa, κ) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85), compared with 0.70 (range: -0.13-1.00; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73) and 0.71 (range: 0.08-1.00) for ophthalmologists and optometrists, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of the deep learning system and ophthalmologists or optometrists. CONCLUSION: The AI system obtained a diagnostic performance and repeatability comparable to that of the ophthalmologists and optometrists. We conclude that deep learning based AI systems, such as Pegasus, demonstrate significant promise in the assisted detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning based Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs, and to compare this performance to the performance of a large cohort of ophthalmologists and optometrists. METHODS: A retrospective study evaluating the diagnostic performance of an AI software (Pegasus v1.0, Visulytix Ltd., London UK) and comparing it with that of 243 European ophthalmologists and 208 British optometrists, as determined in previous studies, for the detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy from 94 scanned stereoscopic photographic slides scanned into digital format. RESULTS: Pegasus was able to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy with an accuracy of 83.4% (95% CI: 77.5-89.2). This is comparable to an average ophthalmologist accuracy of 80.5% (95% CI: 67.2-93.8) and average optometrist accuracy of 80% (95% CI: 67-88) on the same images. In addition, the AI system had an intra-observer agreement (Cohen's Kappa, κ) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85), compared with 0.70 (range: -0.13-1.00; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73) and 0.71 (range: 0.08-1.00) for ophthalmologists and optometrists, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of the deep learning system and ophthalmologists or optometrists. CONCLUSION: The AI system obtained a diagnostic performance and repeatability comparable to that of the ophthalmologists and optometrists. We conclude that deep learning based AI systems, such as Pegasus, demonstrate significant promise in the assisted detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Authors: R Harper; N Radi; B C Reeves; C Fenerty; A F Spencer; M Batterbury Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Helen H L Chan; Dai Ni Ong; Yu Xiang G Kong; Evelyn C O'Neill; Surinder S Pandav; Michael A Coote; Jonathan G Crowston Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Daniel E Grigera; Paulo Augusto Arruda Mello; Wilma Lelis Barbosa; Javier Fernando Casiraghi; Rodolfo Perez Grossmann; Alejo Peyret Journal: Arq Bras Oftalmol Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 0.872
Authors: Nicolaas J Reus; Hans G Lemij; David F Garway-Heath; P Juhani Airaksinen; Alfonso Anton; Alain M Bron; Christoph Faschinger; Gábor Holló; Michele Iester; Jost B Jonas; Andrea Mistlberger; Fotis Topouzis; Thierry G Zeyen Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Shona E Hadwin; Tony Redmond; David F Garway-Heath; Hans G Lemij; Nicolaas J Reus; Gavin Ward; Roger S Anderson Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jeffrey De Fauw; Joseph R Ledsam; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Stanislav Nikolov; Nenad Tomasev; Sam Blackwell; Harry Askham; Xavier Glorot; Brendan O'Donoghue; Daniel Visentin; George van den Driessche; Balaji Lakshminarayanan; Clemens Meyer; Faith Mackinder; Simon Bouton; Kareem Ayoub; Reena Chopra; Dominic King; Alan Karthikesalingam; Cían O Hughes; Rosalind Raine; Julian Hughes; Dawn A Sim; Catherine Egan; Adnan Tufail; Hugh Montgomery; Demis Hassabis; Geraint Rees; Trevor Back; Peng T Khaw; Mustafa Suleyman; Julien Cornebise; Pearse A Keane; Olaf Ronneberger Journal: Nat Med Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: José Camara; Alexandre Neto; Ivan Miguel Pires; María Vanessa Villasana; Eftim Zdravevski; António Cunha Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-04-08
Authors: Brian C Stagg; Joshua D Stein; Felipe A Medeiros; Barbara Wirostko; Alan Crandall; M Elizabeth Hartnett; Mollie Cummins; Alan Morris; Rachel Hess; Kensaku Kawamoto Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2020-08-15
Authors: Ravi Aggarwal; Viknesh Sounderajah; Guy Martin; Daniel S W Ting; Alan Karthikesalingam; Dominic King; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2021-04-07
Authors: Ruben Hemelings; Bart Elen; João Barbosa-Breda; Matthew B Blaschko; Patrick De Boever; Ingeborg Stalmans Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 4.379