Literature DB >> 31267086

Evaluation of an AI system for the automated detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs: the European Optic Disc Assessment Study.

Thomas W Rogers1, Nicolas Jaccard2, Francis Carbonaro3, Hans G Lemij4, Koenraad A Vermeer4, Nicolaas J Reus4,5, Sameer Trikha2,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning based Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs, and to compare this performance to the performance of a large cohort of ophthalmologists and optometrists.
METHODS: A retrospective study evaluating the diagnostic performance of an AI software (Pegasus v1.0, Visulytix Ltd., London UK) and comparing it with that of 243 European ophthalmologists and 208 British optometrists, as determined in previous studies, for the detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy from 94 scanned stereoscopic photographic slides scanned into digital format.
RESULTS: Pegasus was able to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy with an accuracy of 83.4% (95% CI: 77.5-89.2). This is comparable to an average ophthalmologist accuracy of 80.5% (95% CI: 67.2-93.8) and average optometrist accuracy of 80% (95% CI: 67-88) on the same images. In addition, the AI system had an intra-observer agreement (Cohen's Kappa, κ) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85), compared with 0.70 (range: -0.13-1.00; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73) and 0.71 (range: 0.08-1.00) for ophthalmologists and optometrists, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of the deep learning system and ophthalmologists or optometrists.
CONCLUSION: The AI system obtained a diagnostic performance and repeatability comparable to that of the ophthalmologists and optometrists. We conclude that deep learning based AI systems, such as Pegasus, demonstrate significant promise in the assisted detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31267086      PMCID: PMC7002599          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-019-0510-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  15 in total

1.  Agreement between ophthalmologists and optometrists in optic disc assessment: training implications for glaucoma co-management.

Authors:  R Harper; N Radi; B C Reeves; C Fenerty; A F Spencer; M Batterbury
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation.

Authors:  Helen H L Chan; Dai Ni Ong; Yu Xiang G Kong; Evelyn C O'Neill; Surinder S Pandav; Michael A Coote; Jonathan G Crowston
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?

Authors:  S Trikha; C Macgregor; M Jeffery; J Kirwan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Level of agreement among Latin American glaucoma subspecialists on the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma: results of an online survey.

Authors:  Daniel E Grigera; Paulo Augusto Arruda Mello; Wilma Lelis Barbosa; Javier Fernando Casiraghi; Rodolfo Perez Grossmann; Alejo Peyret
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.872

6.  Interobserver variability in the estimation of the cup/disk ratio among observers of differing educational background.

Authors:  B A Teitelbaum; R Haefs; D Connor
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2001-11

7.  Clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic disc photographs for glaucoma: the European Optic Disc Assessment Trial.

Authors:  Nicolaas J Reus; Hans G Lemij; David F Garway-Heath; P Juhani Airaksinen; Alfonso Anton; Alain M Bron; Christoph Faschinger; Gábor Holló; Michele Iester; Jost B Jonas; Andrea Mistlberger; Fotis Topouzis; Thierry G Zeyen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Assessment of optic disc photographs for glaucoma by UK optometrists: the Moorfields Optic Disc Assessment Study (MODAS).

Authors:  Shona E Hadwin; Tony Redmond; David F Garway-Heath; Hans G Lemij; Nicolaas J Reus; Gavin Ward; Roger S Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Disc-Aware Ensemble Network for Glaucoma Screening From Fundus Image.

Authors:  Huazhu Fu; Jun Cheng; Yanwu Xu; Changqing Zhang; Damon Wing Kee Wong; Jiang Liu; Xiaochun Cao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey De Fauw; Joseph R Ledsam; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Stanislav Nikolov; Nenad Tomasev; Sam Blackwell; Harry Askham; Xavier Glorot; Brendan O'Donoghue; Daniel Visentin; George van den Driessche; Balaji Lakshminarayanan; Clemens Meyer; Faith Mackinder; Simon Bouton; Kareem Ayoub; Reena Chopra; Dominic King; Alan Karthikesalingam; Cían O Hughes; Rosalind Raine; Julian Hughes; Dawn A Sim; Catherine Egan; Adnan Tufail; Hugh Montgomery; Demis Hassabis; Geraint Rees; Trevor Back; Peng T Khaw; Mustafa Suleyman; Julien Cornebise; Pearse A Keane; Olaf Ronneberger
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The use of deep learning technology for the detection of optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Mei Li; Chao Wan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

2.  Artificial Intelligence for Glaucoma: Creating and Implementing Artificial Intelligence for Disease Detection and Progression.

Authors:  Lama A Al-Aswad; Rithambara Ramachandran; Joel S Schuman; Felipe Medeiros; Malvina B Eydelman
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2022-02-24

Review 3.  A Comprehensive Review of Methods and Equipment for Aiding Automatic Glaucoma Tracking.

Authors:  José Camara; Alexandre Neto; Ivan Miguel Pires; María Vanessa Villasana; Eftim Zdravevski; António Cunha
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  Special Commentary: Using Clinical Decision Support Systems to Bring Predictive Models to the Glaucoma Clinic.

Authors:  Brian C Stagg; Joshua D Stein; Felipe A Medeiros; Barbara Wirostko; Alan Crandall; M Elizabeth Hartnett; Mollie Cummins; Alan Morris; Rachel Hess; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-08-15

Review 5.  Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ravi Aggarwal; Viknesh Sounderajah; Guy Martin; Daniel S W Ting; Alan Karthikesalingam; Dominic King; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-04-07

6.  Deep learning on fundus images detects glaucoma beyond the optic disc.

Authors:  Ruben Hemelings; Bart Elen; João Barbosa-Breda; Matthew B Blaschko; Patrick De Boever; Ingeborg Stalmans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  A Review of Deep Learning for Screening, Diagnosis, and Detection of Glaucoma Progression.

Authors:  Atalie C Thompson; Alessandro A Jammal; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.