Literature DB >> 24875227

Portsmouth visual field database: an audit of glaucoma progression.

J F Kirwan1, A Hustler1, H Bobat1, L Toms1, D P Crabb2, A I McNaught3.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore visual field (VF) progression in a cohort of secondary care-treated glaucoma and ocular hypertensive (OHT) patients.
METHODS: We extracted VFs from our database drawn from our normal clinical practice. VF series from 4177 eyes from 2208 patients who had five or more VFs were obtained, the 'better' eye was selected and the rate of VF progression was calculated using mean deviation (MD) data.
RESULTS: The median rate of progression for the whole sample was -0.1 dB/year (interquartile range (IQR) -4 to 0 dB/year) over a median of 6.7 years (IQR 4.9-8.7). Of 2208 patients, 477 (21.2%) progressed at > -0.5 dB/year; 46 (2.1%) progressed at >-2.0 dB/year. Of those with a 'final MD' of worse than -10 dB (N=244) in their better eye; 14.0% were 'fast progressors' (>-2 dB/year), 33.7% 'moderate progressors' (-1 to -2 dB/year), and 28.8% 'slow progressors' (-0.3 dB to -1 dB/year). Of those with 'initial MD' better than -3 dB and those with worse than -3 dB, 31/1679 (1.8%) and 213/529 (40.3%) respectively, had a final MD of worse than -10 dB.
CONCLUSION: Fast progressors, while important, are relatively rare. Moderate and slow progressors make up the majority of the progressing population within this data set. The risk of significant visual loss is much higher in those with initial damage. With increasing life expectancy, moderate and slow progressors may become increasingly clinically important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875227      PMCID: PMC4135248          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  33 in total

1.  Big data in epidemiology: too big to fail?

Authors:  Sengwee Toh; Richard Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.

Authors:  B Bengtsson; A Heijl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1998-06

3.  Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  D R Anderson; S M Drance; M Schulzer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Computerized perimetry in glaucoma management.

Authors:  A Heijl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1989-02

5.  The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?

Authors:  S Trikha; C Macgregor; M Jeffery; J Kirwan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Baseline mean deviation and rates of visual field change in treated glaucoma patients.

Authors:  I Forchheimer; C G de Moraes; C C Teng; F Folgar; C Tello; R Ritch; J M Liebmann
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Anders Heijl; Boel Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; M Cristina Leske
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Practical landmarks for visual field disability in glaucoma.

Authors:  Luke J Saunders; Richard A Russell; David P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; D F Garway-Heath; F J Goñi; L Rossetti; B Bengtsson; A C Viswanathan; A Heijl
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines.

Authors:  Rizwan Malik; Helen Baker; Richard A Russell; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prior rates of visual field loss and lifetime risk of blindness in glaucomatous patients undergoing trabeculectomy.

Authors:  W S Foulsham; L Fu; A J Tatham
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  What rates of glaucoma progression are clinically significant?

Authors:  Luke J Saunders; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-13

3.  Improving the Feasibility of Glaucoma Clinical Trials Using Trend-Based Visual Field Progression Endpoints.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; David P Crabb; Balwantray C Chauhan; Jonathan G Crowston; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2019-01-17

Review 4.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.