Literature DB >> 20558500

Two-year study of cervical cord volume and myelin water in primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

C Laule1, I M Vavasour, Y Zhao, A L Traboulsee, J Oger, J D Vavasour, A L Mackay, D K B Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS) is common and an important element in disability. Previous studies demonstrated smaller cervical cord area at the C2 level in MS compared to controls, and a decrease in cord area over 12 months, most marked in primary progressive MS (PPMS). A subset of subjects participating in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of glatiramer acetate in PPMS (PROMiSe trial) were followed for 2 years.
METHODS: 24 PPMS subjects, randomized to placebo (n = 9) and glatiramer acetate (n = 15), and 24 matched controls were studied. Cervical cord volume (CCV) at C2-3 was determined using a 3D inversion recovery (IR)-prepared spoiled-gradient echo sequence. Myelin water fraction (MWF) at C2-3 was obtained using a 32-echo IR-prepared relaxation sequence. Scans were repeated at baseline, years 1 and 2.
RESULTS: Baseline CCV was significantly smaller for PPMS than controls [median (interquartile range) 951 (829-1043) vs. 1072 (1040-1129) mm(3), p = 0.0004] and MWF trended to be lower in PPMS cord [median (interquartile range) 0.225 (0.187-0.267) vs. 0.253 (0.235-0.266), p = 0.12]. Baseline CCV correlated with baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale, disease duration, brain white and grey matter volume. In PPMS, CCV was significantly decreased at year 1 (-0.83%, p = 0.04) and year 2 (-1.65%, p = 0.02). Baseline MWF correlated with baseline CCV and brain white and grey matter volume. MWF was significantly decreased from baseline for PPMS at year 2 (-10.5%, p = 0.01). Treatment effect was not detected on change in CCV nor MWF.
CONCLUSIONS: Metrics at the level of the cord, including volume and MWF at C2-3, were lower in PPMS than controls and changed over 2 years only in PPMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20558500     DOI: 10.1177/1352458510365586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  20 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Kedar R Mahajan; Daniel Ontaneda
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Short-term stability of T1 and T2 relaxation measures in multiple sclerosis normal appearing white matter.

Authors:  Alice L W Liang; Irene M Vavasour; Burkhard Mädler; Anthony L Traboulsee; Donna J Lang; David K B Li; Alex L MacKay; Cornelia Laule
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Inferring brain tissue composition and microstructure via MR relaxometry.

Authors:  Mark D Does
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Assessing structure and function of myelin in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Evidence of demyelination.

Authors:  Hanwen Liu; Erin L MacMillian; Catherine R Jutzeler; Emil Ljungberg; Alex L MacKay; Shannon H Kolind; Burkhard Mädler; David K B Li; Marcel F Dvorak; Armin Curt; Cornelia Laule; John L K Kramer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Quantitative relaxometry of the brain.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04

6.  Reliable volumetry of the cervical spinal cord in MS patient follow-up data with cord image analyzer (Cordial).

Authors:  Michael Amann; Simon Pezold; Yvonne Naegelin; Ketut Fundana; Michaela Andělová; Katrin Weier; Christoph Stippich; Ludwig Kappos; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Philippe Cattin; Till Sprenger
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in immune-mediated myelopathies.

Authors:  M J Wendebourg; S Nagy; T Derfuss; K Parmar; R Schlaeger
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Translating state-of-the-art spinal cord MRI techniques to clinical use: A systematic review of clinical studies utilizing DTI, MT, MWF, MRS, and fMRI.

Authors:  Allan R Martin; Izabela Aleksanderek; Julien Cohen-Adad; Zenovia Tarmohamed; Lindsay Tetreault; Nathaniel Smith; David W Cadotte; Adrian Crawley; Howard Ginsberg; David J Mikulis; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 9.  The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: applications.

Authors:  C A Wheeler-Kingshott; P W Stroman; J M Schwab; M Bacon; R Bosma; J Brooks; D W Cadotte; T Carlstedt; O Ciccarelli; J Cohen-Adad; A Curt; N Evangelou; M G Fehlings; M Filippi; B J Kelley; S Kollias; A Mackay; C A Porro; S Smith; S M Strittmatter; P Summers; A J Thompson; I Tracey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: methods.

Authors:  P W Stroman; C Wheeler-Kingshott; M Bacon; J M Schwab; R Bosma; J Brooks; D Cadotte; T Carlstedt; O Ciccarelli; J Cohen-Adad; A Curt; N Evangelou; M G Fehlings; M Filippi; B J Kelley; S Kollias; A Mackay; C A Porro; S Smith; S M Strittmatter; P Summers; I Tracey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.