Literature DB >> 20557177

Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients.

Tommaso Lupattelli1, Fadi Tannouri, Francesco Giuseppe Garaci, Giovanni Papa, Martina Pangos, Francesco Somalvico, Carlo Caravaggi, Ezio Faglia.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a retrospective evaluation of the 6-F Angio-Seal closure device in antegrade and retrograde common femoral artery (CFA) punctures during endovascular procedures in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).
METHODS: From January 2005 to March 2009, 2374 diabetic CLI patients underwent interventional procedures in the lower limbs at a single center under systemic anticoagulation (heparin 70 U/kg). In this population, 2016 patients (1184 men; mean age 69.6+/-9.1 years) had 2372 CFA punctures treated with either manual compression [205 punctures in 161 (8.0%) patients] or Angio-Seal deployment (2167 punctures in 1855 patients) and were eligible for this analysis. In the study cohort, there were 1889 antegrade CFA punctures closed with the device in 1626 (87.6%) patients compared to 278 retrograde punctures sealed in 229 (12.4%) patients. The complications from the antegrade CFA punctures were compared to those from retrograde closure and manual compression.
RESULTS: The success rate for achieving hemostasis after antegrade and retrograde Angio-Seal placement was 97.9% and 97.8%, respectively. Major complications following antegrade Angio-Seal deployment, retrograde Angio-Seal deployment, and manual compression occurred in 20/1889 (1.1%), 5/278 (1.8%), and 4/205 (2.0%) cases, respectively. All complications developed within 24 hours of the procedure. No further complications were recorded in the 18-month follow-up (range 1-36). The overall complication rates after antegrade puncture closure, retrograde puncture closure, and manual compression at 30 days was 2.5%, 4.0%, and 4.9%, respectively (p = NS).
CONCLUSION: This retrospective study shows that the 6-F Angio-Seal is a valuable and safe vascular closure device for percutaneous transfemoral antegrade access in diabetic patients undergoing interventional procedures for CLI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20557177     DOI: 10.1583/09-2960.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  9 in total

1.  Antegrade common femoral artery closure device use is associated with decreased complications.

Authors:  Joel L Ramirez; Devin S Zarkowsky; Thomas A Sorrentino; Caitlin W Hicks; Shant M Vartanian; Warren J Gasper; Michael S Conte; James C Iannuzzi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how?

Authors:  Iacopo Barbetta; Jos C van den Berg
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Haemostasis with the FISH Vascular Closure Device after 6 French Transfemoral Accesses in Interventional Radiology: Clinical Results.

Authors:  Peter C Kamusella; Christopher W Lüdtke; Fabian Scheer; Reimer Andresen; Christian Wissgott
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  Delayed complication from a percutaneous vascular closure device following a neuro-interventional procedure.

Authors:  Ahmed Khaldi; B Waldau; C Skowlund; G J Velat; J Mocco; B L Hoh
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  The modified interventional method of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: modified Angio-Seal haemostasis technique: Modified Angio-Seal haemostasis technique.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Koji Hozawa; Sunao Nakamura
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  [Arterial closure devices. What device for which clinical situation?].

Authors:  M Treitl; K M Eberhardt; D Maxien; B Behrends; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Exoseal for puncture site closure after antegrade procedures in peripheral arterial disease patients.

Authors:  Gerald Hackl; Thomas Gary; Klara Belaj; Franz Hafner; Peter Rief; Hannes Deutschmann; Marianne Brodmann
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Percutaneous Vascular Closure System Based on an Extravascular, Bioabsorbable Polyglycolic Plug (ExoSeal): Results from 1000 Patients.

Authors:  P Kamusella; C Wissgott; T Jahnke; J Brossmann; F Scheer; C W Lüdtke; R Andresen
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-10

9.  Lower extremity amputations in persons with and without diabetes in Italy: 2001-2010.

Authors:  Flavia L Lombardo; Marina Maggini; Alessandra De Bellis; Giuseppe Seghieri; Roberto Anichini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.