Literature DB >> 20555712

Wavelength choice for soft x-ray laser holography of biological samples.

R A London, M D Rosen, J E Trebes.   

Abstract

The choice of an optimal wavelength for soft x-ray holography is discussed, based on a description of scattering by biological structures within an aqueous environment. We conclude that wavelengths slightly longer than the 43.7-A carbon K-edge provide a good trade off between minimizing the necessary source power and the dose absorbed by the sample and maximizing the penetrability of the x-rays through wet samples. This differs from the previous notion that wavelengths within the water window (between 23.2 A and 43.7 A) would be the best for holography. The problem of motion resulting from the absorption of x rays during a short exposure is described. The possibility of using ultrashort exposures in order to capture the image before motion can compromise the resolution is explored. The impact of these calculations on the question of the feasibility of using an x-ray laser for holography of biological structures is discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 20555712     DOI: 10.1364/AO.28.003397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  9 in total

1.  Incorrect support and missing center tolerances of phasing algorithms.

Authors:  Xiaojing Huang; Johanna Nelson; Jan Steinbrener; Janos Kirz; Joshua J Turner; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  An assessment of the resolution limitation due to radiation-damage in x-ray diffraction microscopy.

Authors:  M R Howells; T Beetz; H N Chapman; C Cui; J M Holton; C J Jacobsen; J Kirz; E Lima; S Marchesini; H Miao; D Sayre; D A Shapiro; J C H Spence; D Starodub
Journal:  J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.957

3.  Data preparation and evaluation techniques for x-ray diffraction microscopy.

Authors:  Jan Steinbrener; Johanna Nelson; Xiaojing Huang; Stefano Marchesini; David Shapiro; Joshua J Turner; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Signal-to-noise and radiation exposure considerations in conventional and diffraction x-ray microscopy.

Authors:  Xiaojing Huang; Huijie Miao; Jan Steinbrener; Johanna Nelson; David Shapiro; Andrew Stewart; Joshua Turner; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Relative merits and limiting factors for x-ray and electron microscopy of thick, hydrated organic materials.

Authors:  Ming Du; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  X-ray ptychographic and fluorescence microscopy of frozen-hydrated cells using continuous scanning.

Authors:  Junjing Deng; David J Vine; Si Chen; Qiaoling Jin; Youssef S G Nashed; Tom Peterka; Stefan Vogt; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Signal enhancement and Patterson-search phasing for high-spatial-resolution coherent X-ray diffraction imaging of biological objects.

Authors:  Yuki Takayama; Saori Maki-Yonekura; Tomotaka Oroguchi; Masayoshi Nakasako; Koji Yonekura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Three dimensions, two microscopes, one code: Automatic differentiation for x-ray nanotomography beyond the depth of focus limit.

Authors:  Ming Du; Youssef S G Nashed; Saugat Kandel; Doğa Gürsoy; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 9.  Upscaling X-ray nanoimaging to macroscopic specimens.

Authors:  Ming Du; Zichao Wendy Di; Doǧa Gürsoy; R Patrick Xian; Yevgenia Kozorovitskiy; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.868

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.