Literature DB >> 20554734

131I-tositumomab radioimmunotherapy: initial tumor dose-response results using 3-dimensional dosimetry including radiobiologic modeling.

Yuni K Dewaraja1, Matthew J Schipper, Peter L Roberson, Scott J Wilderman, Hanan Amro, Denise D Regan, Kenneth F Koral, Mark S Kaminski, Anca M Avram.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: For optimal treatment planning in radionuclide therapy, robust tumor dose-response correlations must be established. Here, fully 3-dimensional (3D) dosimetry was performed coupling SPECT/CT at multiple time points with Monte Carlo-based voxel-by-voxel dosimetry to examine such correlations.
METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing (131)I-tositumomab for the treatment of refractory B-cell lymphoma volunteered for the study. Sixty tumors were imaged. Activity quantification and dosimetry were performed using previously developed 3D algorithms for SPECT reconstruction and absorbed dose estimation. Tumors were outlined on CT at multiple time points to obtain absorbed dose distributions in the presence of tumor deformation and regression. Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) was calculated to assess the biologic effects of the nonuniform absorbed dose, including the cold antibody effect. Response for correlation analysis was determined on the basis of the percentage reduction in the product of the largest perpendicular tumor diameters on CT at 2 mo. Overall response classification (as complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease) used for prediction analysis was based on criteria that included findings on PET.
RESULTS: Of the evaluated tumor-absorbed dose summary measures (mean absorbed dose, EUD, and other measures from dose-volume histogram analysis), a statistically significant correlation with response was seen only with EUD (r = 0.36 and P = 0.006 at the individual tumor level; r = 0.46 and P = 0.048 at the patient level). The median value of mean absorbed dose for stable disease, partial response, and complete response patients was 196, 346, and 342 cGy, respectively, whereas the median value of EUD for each of these categories was 170, 363, and 406 cGy, respectively. At a threshold of 200 cGy, both mean absorbed dose and EUD had a positive predictive value for responders (partial response + complete response) of 0.875 (14/16) and a negative predictive value of 1.0 (3/3).
CONCLUSION: Improved dose-response correlations were demonstrated when EUD incorporating the cold antibody effect was used instead of the conventionally used mean tumor-absorbed dose. This work demonstrates the importance of 3D calculation and radiobiologic modeling when estimating absorbed dose for correlation with outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20554734      PMCID: PMC3302158          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.075176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

1.  Methodology to incorporate biologically effective dose and equivalent uniform dose in patient-specific 3-dimensional dosimetry for non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients targeted with 131I-tositumomab therapy.

Authors:  Hanan Amro; Scott J Wilderman; Yuni K Dewaraja; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Dosimetry of internal emitters.

Authors:  George Sgouros
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Nuclear medicine dosimetry.

Authors:  Michael Stabin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Recovery of total I-131 activity within focal volumes using SPECT and 3D OSEM.

Authors:  Kenneth F Koral; Anastasia Yendiki; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Implications of nonuniform tumor doses for radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  J A O'Donoghue
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The radioisotope contributes significantly to the activity of radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas A Davis; Mark S Kaminski; John P Leonard; Frank J Hsu; Mary Wilkinson; Andrew Zelenetz; Richard L Wahl; Stewart Kroll; Morton Coleman; Michael Goris; Ronald Levy; Susan J Knox
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Accurate dosimetry in 131I radionuclide therapy using patient-specific, 3-dimensional methods for SPECT reconstruction and absorbed dose calculation.

Authors:  Yuni K Dewaraja; Scott J Wilderman; Michael Ljungberg; Kenneth F Koral; Kenneth Zasadny; Mark S Kaminiski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Patient-specific, 3-dimensional dosimetry in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with 131I-anti-B1 antibody: assessment of tumor dose-response.

Authors:  George Sgouros; Shannon Squeri; Ase M Ballangrud; Katherine S Kolbert; Jerrold B Teitcher; Katherine S Panageas; Ronald D Finn; Chaitanya R Divgi; Steven M Larson; Andrew D Zelenetz
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Change in tumor-absorbed dose due to decrease in mass during fractionated radioimmunotherapy in lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Cecilia Hindorf; Ola Lindén; Lars Stenberg; Jan Tennvall; Sven-Erik Strand
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  43 in total

1.  Comparison of I-131 radioimmunotherapy tumor dosimetry: unit density sphere model versus patient-specific Monte Carlo calculations.

Authors:  David M Howard; Kimberlee J Kearfott; Scott J Wilderman; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.099

2.  [SPECT/CT - Technical aspects and optimization possibilities].

Authors:  W Römer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Bio-effect model applied to 131I radioimmunotherapy of refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Peter L Roberson; Hanan Amro; Scott J Wilderman; Anca M Avram; Mark S Kaminski; Matthew J Schipper; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Clinical radioimmunotherapy--the role of radiobiology.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Isabelle Navarro-Teulon; Manuel Bardiès; Nicolas Chouin; Guillaume Cartron; André Pèlegrin; David Azria
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Post-reconstruction non-local means filtering methods using CT side information for quantitative SPECT.

Authors:  Se Young Chun; Jeffrey A Fessler; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Beyond Dose: Using Pretherapy Biomarkers to Improve Dose Prediction of Outcomes for Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Peter L Roberson; Lauren B Smith; Meredith A Morgan; Matthew J Schipper; Scott J Wilderman; Anca M Avram; Mark S Kaminski; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  Advances in immuno-positron emission tomography: antibodies for molecular imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Scott M Knowles; Anna M Wu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Tumor-Absorbed Dose Predicts Progression-Free Survival Following (131)I-Tositumomab Radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Yuni K Dewaraja; Matthew J Schipper; Jincheng Shen; Lauren B Smith; Jure Murgic; Hatice Savas; Ehab Youssef; Denise Regan; Scott J Wilderman; Peter L Roberson; Mark S Kaminski; Anca M Avram
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Redefining relative biological effectiveness in the context of the EQDX formalism: implications for alpha-particle emitter therapy.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; Roger W Howell; Hong Song; Sébastien Baechler; George Sgouros
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Pretreatment CLR 124 Positron Emission Tomography Accurately Predicts CLR 131 Three-Dimensional Dosimetry in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patient.

Authors:  Abigail E Besemer; Joseph J Grudzinski; Jamey P Weichert; Lance T Hall; Bryan P Bednarz
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.