Literature DB >> 24502376

Redefining relative biological effectiveness in the context of the EQDX formalism: implications for alpha-particle emitter therapy.

Robert F Hobbs1, Roger W Howell, Hong Song, Sébastien Baechler, George Sgouros.   

Abstract

Alpha-particle radiopharmaceutical therapy (αRPT) is currently enjoying increasing attention as a viable alternative to chemotherapy for targeting of disseminated micrometastatic disease. In theory, αRPT can be personalized through pre-therapeutic imaging and dosimetry. However, in practice, given the particularities of α-particle emissions, a dosimetric methodology that accurately predicts the thresholds for organ toxicity has not been reported. This is in part due to the fact that the biological effects caused by α-particle radiation differ markedly from the effects caused by traditional external beam (photon or electron) radiation or β-particle emitting radiopharmaceuticals. The concept of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is used to quantify the ratio of absorbed doses required to achieve a given biological response with alpha particles versus a reference radiation (typically a beta emitter or external beam radiation). However, as conventionally defined, the RBE varies as a function of absorbed dose and therefore a single RBE value is limited in its utility because it cannot be used to predict response over a wide range of absorbed doses. Therefore, efforts are underway to standardize bioeffect modeling for different fractionation schemes and dose rates for both nuclear medicine and external beam radiotherapy. Given the preponderant use of external beams of radiation compared to nuclear medicine in cancer therapy, the more clinically relevant quantity, the 2 Gy equieffective dose, EQD2(α/β), has recently been proposed by the ICRU. In concert with EQD2(α/β), we introduce a new, redefined RBE quantity, named RBE2(α/β), as the ratio of the two linear coefficients that characterize the α particle absorbed dose-response curve and the low-LET megavoltage photon 2 Gy fraction equieffective dose-response curve. The theoretical framework for the proposed new formalism is presented along with its application to experimental data obtained from irradiation of a breast cancer cell line. Radiobiological parameters are obtained using the linear quadratic model to fit cell survival data for MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells that were irradiated with either α particles or a single fraction of low-LET (137)Cs γ rays. From these, the linear coefficient for both the biologically effective dose (BED) and the EQD2(α/β) response lines were derived for fractionated irradiation. The standard RBE calculation, using the traditional single fraction reference radiation, gave RBE values that ranged from 2.4 for a surviving fraction of 0.82-6.0 for a surviving fraction of 0.02, while the dose-independent RBE2(4.6) value was 4.5 for all surviving fraction values. Furthermore, bioeffect modeling with RBE2(α/β) and EQD2(α/β) demonstrated the capacity to predict the surviving fraction of cells irradiated with acute and fractionated low-LET radiation, α particles and chronic exponentially decreasing dose rates of low-LET radiation. RBE2(α/β) is independent of absorbed dose for α-particle emitters and it provides a more logical framework for data reporting and conversion to equieffective dose than the conventional dose-dependent definition of RBE. Moreover, it provides a much needed foundation for the ongoing development of an α-particle dosimetry paradigm and will facilitate the use of tolerance dose data available from external beam radiation therapy, thereby helping to develop αRPT as a single modality as well as for combination therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24502376      PMCID: PMC3984880          DOI: 10.1667/RR13483.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  41 in total

1.  Universal survival curve and single fraction equivalent dose: useful tools in understanding potency of ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Clint Park; Lech Papiez; Shichuan Zhang; Michael Story; Robert D Timmerman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Calculation of the biological effective dose for piecewise defined dose-rate fits.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; George Sgouros
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evidence of extranuclear cell sensitivity to alpha-particle radiation using a microdosimetric model. I. Presentation and validation of a microdosimetric model.

Authors:  N Chouin; K Bernardeau; F Davodeau; M Chérel; A Faivre-Chauvet; M Bourgeois; C Apostolidis; A Morgenstern; A Lisbona; M Bardiès
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  MIRD pamphlet No. 20: the effect of model assumptions on kidney dosimetry and response--implications for radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Barry W Wessels; Mark W Konijnenberg; Roger G Dale; Hazel B Breitz; Marta Cremonesi; Ruby F Meredith; Alan J Green; Lionel G Bouchet; A Bertrand Brill; Wesley E Bolch; George Sgouros; Stephen R Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Why more needs to be known about RBE effects in modern radiotherapy.

Authors:  R G Dale; B Jones; A Cárabe-Fernández
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Extension of the biological effective dose to the MIRD schema and possible implications in radionuclide therapy dosimetry.

Authors:  Sébastien Baechler; Robert F Hobbs; Andrew R Prideaux; Richard L Wahl; George Sgouros
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  213Bi (alpha-emitter)-antibody targeting of breast cancer metastases in the neu-N transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  Hong Song; Karineh Shahverdi; David L Huso; Caroline Esaias; James Fox; Alyson Liedy; Allison Liedy; Zhe Zhang; R Todd Reilly; Christos Apostolidis; Alfred Morgenstern; George Sgouros
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Radiobiologic optimization of combination radiopharmaceutical therapy applied to myeloablative treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; Richard L Wahl; Eric C Frey; Yvette Kasamon; Hong Song; Peng Huang; Richard J Jones; George Sgouros
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Radiobiologic significance of response of intratumor quiescent cells in vivo to accelerated carbon ion beams compared with gamma-rays and reactor neutron beams.

Authors:  Shin-Ichiro Masunaga; Koichi Ando; Akiko Uzawa; Ryoichi Hirayama; Yoshiya Furusawa; Sachiko Koike; Yoshinori Sakurai; Kenji Nagata; Minoru Suzuki; Genro Kashino; Yuko Kinashi; Hiroki Tanaka; Akira Maruhashi; Koji Ono
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Intraperitoneal alpha-particle radioimmunotherapy of ovarian cancer patients: pharmacokinetics and dosimetry of (211)At-MX35 F(ab')2--a phase I study.

Authors:  Håkan Andersson; Elin Cederkrantz; Tom Bäck; Chaitanya Divgi; Jörgen Elgqvist; Jakob Himmelman; György Horvath; Lars Jacobsson; Holger Jensen; Sture Lindegren; Stig Palm; Ragnar Hultborn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  13 in total

1.  Automated cassette-based production of high specific activity [203/212Pb]peptide-based theranostic radiopharmaceuticals for image-guided radionuclide therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Mengshi Li; Xiuli Zhang; Thomas P Quinn; Dongyoul Lee; Dijie Liu; Falk Kunkel; Brian E Zimmerman; Daniel McAlister; Keith Olewein; Yusuf Menda; Saed Mirzadeh; Roy Copping; Frances L Johnson; Michael K Schultz
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Cellular Response to Exponentially Increasing and Decreasing Dose Rates: Implications for Treatment Planning in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy.

Authors:  Jay H Solanki; Thomas Tritt; Jordan B Pasternack; Julia J Kim; Calvin N Leung; Jason D Domogauer; Nicholas W Colangelo; Venkat R Narra; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Internal microdosimetry of alpha-emitting radionuclides.

Authors:  Werner Hofmann; Wei Bo Li; Werner Friedland; Brian W Miller; Balázs Madas; Manuel Bardiès; Imre Balásházy
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Overview of the First NRG Oncology-National Cancer Institute Workshop on Dosimetry of Systemic Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Jacek Capala; Stanley H Benedict; Gamal Akabani; Bryan Bednarz; Vikram Bhadrasain; Wesley E Bolch; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Norman C Coleman; Yuni K Dewaraja; Eric Frey; Michael Ghaly; Joseph Grudzinski; Robert F Hobbs; Roger W Howell; John L Humm; Charles A Kunos; Steve Larson; Frank I Lin; Mark Madsen; Saed Mirzadeh; David Morse; Daniel Pryma; George Sgouros; Sara St James; Richard L Wahl; Ying Xiao; Pat Zanzonico; Katherine Zukotynski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  In Vitro comparison of 213Bi- and 177Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Ho Sze Chan; Erik de Blois; Alfred Morgenstern; Frank Bruchertseifer; Marion de Jong; Wouter Breeman; Mark Konijnenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Individual dosimetry system for targeted alpha therapy based on PHITS coupled with microdosimetric kinetic model.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Sato; Takuya Furuta; Yuwei Liu; Sadahiro Naka; Shushi Nagamori; Yoshikatsu Kanai; Tadashi Watabe
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-01-12

7.  Dosimetric Evaluation of the Effect of Receptor Heterogeneity on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Correlation with DNA Damage Induction and In Vivo Survival.

Authors:  Giulia Tamborino; Julie Nonnekens; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Lara Struelens; Danny Feijtel; Marion de Jong; Mark W Konijnenberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 8.  Current Status of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Authors:  Sara St James; Bryan Bednarz; Stanley Benedict; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Yuni Dewaraja; Eric Frey; Robert Hobbs; Joseph Grudzinski; Emilie Roncali; George Sgouros; Jacek Capala; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Modeling bystander effects that cause growth delay of breast cancer xenografts in bone marrow of mice treated with radium-223.

Authors:  Didier A Rajon; Brian S Canter; Calvin N Leung; Tom A Bäck; J Christopher Fritton; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Alpha-Particle-Induced Complex Chromosome Exchanges Transmitted through Extra-Thymic Lymphopoiesis In Vitro Show Evidence of Emerging Genomic Instability.

Authors:  Natalia Sumption; Dudley T Goodhead; Rhona M Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.