Literature DB >> 20554544

Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice.

Aaron Sell1, Gregory A Bryant, Leda Cosmides, John Tooby, Daniel Sznycer, Christopher von Rueden, Andre Krauss, Michael Gurven.   

Abstract

Recent research has shown that humans, like many other animals, have a specialization for assessing fighting ability from visual cues. Because it is probable that the voice contains cues of strength and formidability that are not available visually, we predicted that selection has also equipped humans with the ability to estimate physical strength from the voice. We found that subjects accurately assessed upper-body strength in voices taken from eight samples across four distinct populations and language groups: the Tsimane of Bolivia, Andean herder-horticulturalists and United States and Romanian college students. Regardless of whether raters were told to assess height, weight, strength or fighting ability, they produced similar ratings that tracked upper-body strength independent of height and weight. Male voices were more accurately assessed than female voices, which is consistent with ethnographic data showing a greater tendency among males to engage in violent aggression. Raters extracted information about strength from the voice that was not supplied from visual cues, and were accurate with both familiar and unfamiliar languages. These results provide, to our knowledge, the first direct evidence that both men and women can accurately assess men's physical strength from the voice, and suggest that estimates of strength are used to assess fighting ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20554544      PMCID: PMC2982226          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Preliminary report on hormone receptors in the human vocal fold.

Authors:  S R Newman; J Butler; E H Hammond; S D Gray
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis.

Authors:  Dimitar D Deliyski; Heather S Shaw; Maegan K Evans
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.487

3.  Communication of male quality in owl hoots.

Authors:  Loïc A Hardouin; David Reby; Christian Bavoux; Guy Burneleau; Vincent Bretagnolle
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society.

Authors:  Christopher VON Rueden; Michael Gurven; Hillard Kaplan
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.178

5.  The effect of temporal speech alterations on speaker height and weight identification.

Authors:  N J Lass; P J Barry; R A Reed; J M Walsh; T A Amuso
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1979 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Men's voices and women's choices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  W T Fitch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis.

Authors:  David A Frederick; Martie G Haselton
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-06-19

Review 9.  Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis.

Authors:  John Archer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; Richard Turner; Hideki Kawahara; Toshio Irino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  54 in total

1.  Fitness costs of warfare for women.

Authors:  Michelle Scalise Sugiyama
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-12

Review 2.  A psycho-ethological approach to social signal processing.

Authors:  Marc Mehu; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-02-11

3.  Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies.

Authors:  David A Puts; Coren L Apicella; Rodrigo A Cárdenas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Masculine men articulate less clearly.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; David A Puts; Rodrigo A Cárdenas
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-12

5.  Testing Theories about Ethnic Markers: Ingroup Accent Facilitates Coordination, Not Cooperation.

Authors:  Niels Holm Jensen; Michael Bang Petersen; Henrik Høgh-Olesen; Michael Ejstrup
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2015-06

6.  Invariances in the architecture of pride across small-scale societies.

Authors:  Daniel Sznycer; Dimitris Xygalatas; Sarah Alami; Xiao-Fen An; Kristina I Ananyeva; Shintaro Fukushima; Hidefumi Hitokoto; Alexander N Kharitonov; Jeremy M Koster; Charity N Onyishi; Ike E Onyishi; Pedro P Romero; Kosuke Takemura; Jin-Ying Zhuang; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Form and Function in Human Song.

Authors:  Samuel A Mehr; Manvir Singh; Hunter York; Luke Glowacki; Max M Krasnow
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  A cervid vocal fold model suggests greater glottal efficiency in calling at high frequencies.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Tobias Riede
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?

Authors:  Leslie M Doll; Alexander K Hill; Michelle A Rotella; Rodrigo A Cárdenas; Lisa L M Welling; John R Wheatley; David A Puts
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-06

10.  Men's physical strength moderates conceptualizations of prospective foes in two disparate societies.

Authors:  Daniel M T Fessler; Colin Holbrook; Matthew M Gervais
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.