Literature DB >> 17578932

Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis.

David A Frederick1, Martie G Haselton.   

Abstract

Evolutionary scientists propose that exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics are cues of genes that increase offspring viability or reproductive success. In six studies the hypothesis that muscularity is one such cue is tested. As predicted, women rate muscular men as sexier, more physically dominant and volatile, and less committed to their mates than nonmuscular men. Consistent with the inverted-U hypothesis of masculine traits, men with moderate muscularity are rated most attractive. Consistent with past research on fitness cues, across two measures, women indicate that their most recent short-term sex partners were more muscular than their other sex partners (ds = .36, .47). Across three studies, when controlling for other characteristics (e.g., body fat), muscular men rate their bodies as sexier to women (partial rs = .49-.62) and report more lifetime sex partners (partial rs = .20-.27), short-term partners (partial rs = .25-.28), and more affairs with mated women (partial r = .28).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17578932     DOI: 10.1177/0146167207303022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  42 in total

1.  The Competition-Violence Hypothesis: Sex, Marriage, and Male Aggression.

Authors:  Patrick M Seffrin
Journal:  Justice Q       Date:  2016-08-17

2.  The Curse of Curves: Sex Differences in the Associations Between Body Shape and Pain Expression.

Authors:  Jacob M Vigil; Chance R Strenth; Andrea A Mueller; Jared DiDomenico; Diego Guevara Beltran; Patrick Coulombe; Jane Ellen Smith
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2015-06

3.  Unpacking the psychological weight of weight stigma: A rejection-expectation pathway.

Authors:  Alison Blodorn; Brenda Major; Jeffrey Hunger; Carol Miller
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01

4.  In fitness and health? A prospective study of changes in marital status and fitness in men and women.

Authors:  Francisco B Ortega; Wendy J Brown; Duck-chul Lee; Meghan Baruth; Xuemei Sui; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Body weight relationships in early marriage. Weight relevance, weight comparisons, and weight talk.

Authors:  Caron F Bove; Jeffery Sobal
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; Aaron W Lukazsweski; Michael Townsley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Formidability and the logic of human anger.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; John Tooby; Leda Cosmides
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Intrasexual Competition and Eating Restriction in Heterosexual and Homosexual Individuals.

Authors:  Norman P Li; April R Smith; Vladas Griskevicius; Margaret J Cason; Angela Bryan
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.178

9.  Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; Gregory A Bryant; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby; Daniel Sznycer; Christopher von Rueden; Andre Krauss; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby; Daniel Sznycer; Christopher von Rueden; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.