Literature DB >> 18982655

How does the camera assistant decide the zooming ratio of laparoscopic images? Analysis and implementation.

Atsushi Nishikawa1, Hiroaki Nakagoe, Kazuhiro Taniguchi, Yasuo Yamada, Mitsugu Sekimoto, Shuji Takiguchi, Morito Monden, Fumio Miyazaki.   

Abstract

An important factor for defining a good image during laparoscopic surgery is the zooming ratio, which corresponds to the depth of insertion of the laparoscope along its longitudinal axis. However, it is not clear how surgeons (camera assistants) decide the zooming ratio of laparoscopic images during surgery. Conventional automatic camera positioning systems define the zooming ratio "uniformly" based on simple heuristics. However, because the most adequate zooming ratio varies widely during surgery, these conventional systems may not offer the specific view that the surgeon wants. Therefore, we first investigated how the camera assistant decides the zooming ratio of laparoscopic images by fully analyzing the positional relationship between the laparoscope and the surgical instrument during laparoscopic surgery. Then, we extracted the zooming behavior and implemented it in the robotic laparoscope positioner that we previously developed. As a result, the zooming behavior of our robotic system became very similar to that of the human camera assistant. It was found that the proposed zooming motion of our robotic system may be suitable for fast and compact operations during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18982655     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85990-1_73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education.

Authors:  Badma Bashankaev; Sergey Baido; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Analysis of surgeon's line of sight using an optical tracking system with a multifaceted marker device.

Authors:  Hiroaki Tsunezuka; Daishiro Kato; Kunihiko Terauchi; Masanori Shimomura; Kaori Ichise; Kazuhiro Ito; Atsushi Nishikawa; Junichi Shimada
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Development and evaluation of a master-slave robot system for single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Yuki Horise; Atsushi Nishikawa; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Yu Kitanaka; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Shuji Takiguchi; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori; Fumio Miyazaki
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Toward increased autonomy in the surgical OR: needs, requests, and expectations.

Authors:  Michael Kranzfelder; Christoph Staub; Adam Fiolka; Armin Schneider; Sonja Gillen; Dirk Wilhelm; Helmut Friess; Alois Knoll; Hubertus Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Electrically tunable fluidic lens imaging system for laparoscopic fluorescence-guided surgery.

Authors:  Davide Volpi; Iain D C Tullis; Paul R Barber; Edyta M Augustyniak; Sean C Smart; Katherine A Vallis; Borivoj Vojnovic
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Robotic Endoscope Control Via Autonomous Instrument Tracking.

Authors:  Caspar Gruijthuijsen; Luis C Garcia-Peraza-Herrera; Gianni Borghesan; Dominiek Reynaerts; Jan Deprest; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren; Emmanuel Vander Poorten
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-04-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.