Literature DB >> 20552287

Motion-artifact-free in vivo imaging utilizing narcotized avian embryos in ovo.

Alexander Heidrich1, Lydia Würbach, Thomas Opfermann, Hans Peter Saluz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The chick embryo in ovo is a well-accessible and economical in vivo model, but its use in molecular imaging has been limited because of motion artifacts on resulting images. The purpose of this study was to develop a method using narcotics to inhibit motility and to perform motion-artifact-free imaging of living chick embryos in ovo. PROCEDURES: Chick embryos in ovo were narcotized using three different narcotics: isoflurane, 2,2,2-tribromoethanol, and urethane/α-chloralose. Narcotized embryos were imaged using micro-computed tomography (microCT) at days 10-18 of incubation, and the resulting images were analyzed for reduction of motion artifacts.
RESULTS: All three anesthetics could be used for anesthetizing living chick embryos in ovo thus allowing the acquisition of motion-artifact-free images.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experiments revealed that isoflurane is the best-suited narcotic for single and repeated applications to image living chick embryos in ovo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20552287     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-010-0355-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  31 in total

1.  The chick embryo as a model system for analyzing mechanisms of development.

Authors:  D K Darnell; G C Schoenwolf
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  Noninvasive monitoring of chick development in ovo using a 7T MRI system from day 12 of incubation through to hatching.

Authors:  Maureen M Bain; Andrew J Fagan; James M Mullin; Iain McNaught; John McLean; Barrie Condon
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Optimization of volumetric computed tomography for skeletal analysis of model genetic organisms.

Authors:  Sergio X Vasquez; Mark S Hansen; Ali N Bahadur; Matthew F Hockin; Gordon L Kindlmann; Lisa Nevell; Isabel Q Wu; David J Grunwald; David M Weinstein; Greg M Jones; Christopher R Johnson; John L Vandeberg; Mario R Capecchi; Charles Keller
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  The hemodynamic effects of halothane and isoflurane in chick embryo.

Authors:  J A Wojtczak
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Challenges in small animal noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  R S Balaban; V A Hampshire
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2001

6.  The formation of axonal projections of the mesencephalic trigeminal neurones in chick embryos.

Authors:  J Hiscock; C Straznicky
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1986-04

7.  Alpha-chloralose as a capture and restraint agent of birds: therapeutic index determination in the chicken.

Authors:  M F Loibl; R E Clutton; B D Marx; C J McGrath
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.535

8.  Effects of short storage conditions and broiler breeder age on hatchability, hatching time, and chick weights.

Authors:  L H Reis; L T Gama; M C Soares
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Inhibition of urethane-induced carcinogenicity in cyp2e1-/- in comparison to cyp2e1+/+ mice.

Authors:  Burhan I Ghanayem
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Animal models of neurodegenerative disease: insights from in vivo imaging studies.

Authors:  Elissa M Strome; Doris J Doudet
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.484

View more
  5 in total

1.  Insights into bone metabolism of avian embryos in ovo via 3D and 4D 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Lydia Würbach; Alexander Heidrich; Thomas Opfermann; Peter Gebhardt; Hans Peter Saluz
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Quantitative three-dimensional imaging of live avian embryonic morphogenesis via micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Alyssa L Henning; Michael X Jiang; Huseyin C Yalcin; Jonathan T Butcher
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.780

3.  In-ovo imaging using ostrich eggs: Biomagnetism for detection of cardiac signals and embryonal motion.

Authors:  Martin Freesmeyer; Hanna Hermeyer; Christian Kuehnel; Olga Perkas; Julia Greiser; Otto W Witte; Thomas Winkens
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Multi-Modal PET and MR Imaging in the Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) Model for Initial in Vivo Testing of Target-Specific Radioligands.

Authors:  Gordon Winter; Andrea B F Koch; Jessica Löffler; Mika Lindén; Christoph Solbach; Alireza Abaei; Hao Li; Gerhard Glatting; Ambros J Beer; Volker Rasche
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts.

Authors:  Conny Waschkies; Flora Nicholls; Johanna Buschmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.