INTRODUCTION: In this study, we investigated the prognostic and predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression in 30 pediatric high grade gliomas (pHGG). METHODS: MGMT promoter methylation was assayed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), whereas MGMT protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: MGMT promoter methylation was observed in 7/24 (30%) cases, whereas MGMT protein overexpression was found in 19/28 (68%) cases with similar distribution in grade III and grade IV gliomas. Median survival of methylated and unmethylated patients was 16 and 8 months, respectively. Moreover, overall survival and progression-free survival showed a trend toward reduction in patients with unmethylation (p = 0.9 and p = 0.7, respectively). For MGMT protein expression, the median survival was 8.5 and 17 months for patients with MGMT overexpression or low expression, respectively. Although these two groups did not show statistically significant differences in terms of overall survival or progression-free survival (p = 0.8 and p = 0.7, respectively), there was a significant correlation between MGMT protein expression and MGMT promoter methylation status (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that, in pHGG, (a) MGMT promoter methylation is less frequent than in adult malignant gliomas, (b) there is a high correlation between MGMT MSP and MGMT IHC, and (c) as in adults, MGMT status is associated with prognosis, although this observation has to be statistically validated on larger series of patients.
INTRODUCTION: In this study, we investigated the prognostic and predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression in 30 pediatric high grade gliomas (pHGG). METHODS:MGMT promoter methylation was assayed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), whereas MGMT protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS:MGMT promoter methylation was observed in 7/24 (30%) cases, whereas MGMT protein overexpression was found in 19/28 (68%) cases with similar distribution in grade III and grade IV gliomas. Median survival of methylated and unmethylated patients was 16 and 8 months, respectively. Moreover, overall survival and progression-free survival showed a trend toward reduction in patients with unmethylation (p = 0.9 and p = 0.7, respectively). For MGMT protein expression, the median survival was 8.5 and 17 months for patients with MGMT overexpression or low expression, respectively. Although these two groups did not show statistically significant differences in terms of overall survival or progression-free survival (p = 0.8 and p = 0.7, respectively), there was a significant correlation between MGMT protein expression and MGMT promoter methylation status (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that, in pHGG, (a) MGMT promoter methylation is less frequent than in adult malignant gliomas, (b) there is a high correlation between MGMT MSP and MGMT IHC, and (c) as in adults, MGMT status is associated with prognosis, although this observation has to be statistically validated on larger series of patients.
Authors: C H Rickert; R Sträter; P Kaatsch; H Wassmann; H Jürgens; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; W Paulus Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Ian F Pollack; Ronald L Hamilton; Robert W Sobol; Judith Burnham; Allan J Yates; Emiko J Holmes; Tianni Zhou; Jonathan L Finlay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marta Brell; Avelina Tortosa; Eugenia Verger; Juan Miguel Gil; Nuria Viñolas; Salvador Villá; Juan José Acebes; Lluis Caral; Teresa Pujol; Isidro Ferrer; Teresa Ribalta; Francesc Graus Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Regina I Jakacki; Allan Yates; Susan M Blaney; Tianni Zhou; Robert Timmerman; Ashish M Ingle; Lynda Flom; Michael D Prados; Peter C Adamson; Ian F Pollack Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Monika E Hegi; Annie-Claire Diserens; Sophie Godard; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Luca Regli; Sandrine Ostermann; Philippe Otten; Guy Van Melle; Nicolas de Tribolet; Roger Stupp Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David D Eisenstat; Ian F Pollack; Alain Demers; Mark V Sapp; Pascal Lambert; James D Weisfeld-Adams; Peter C Burger; Floyd Gilles; Richard L Davis; Roger Packer; James M Boyett; Jonathan L Finlay Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Swetal Patel; Amit Bhatnagar; Christopher Wear; Stephen Osiro; Abigail Gabriel; David Kimball; Alana John; Paul J Fields; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2013-10-27 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Dominik Sturm; Sebastian Bender; David T W Jones; Peter Lichter; Jacques Grill; Oren Becher; Cynthia Hawkins; Jacek Majewski; Chris Jones; Joseph F Costello; Antonio Iavarone; Kenneth Aldape; Cameron W Brennan; Nada Jabado; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 60.716