Literature DB >> 18400046

Anti-O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma multiforme: observer variability and lack of association with patient survival impede its use as clinical biomarker.

Matthias Preusser1, Robert Charles Janzer, Jörg Felsberg, Guido Reifenberger, Marie-France Hamou, Annie-Claire Diserens, Roger Stupp, Thierry Gorlia, Christine Marosi, Harald Heinzl, Johannes A Hainfellner, Monika Hegi.   

Abstract

Silencing of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein expression because of MGMT gene promoter hypermethylation is considered to be associated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy benefits in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. The objective of this study was to clarify the usability of MGMT immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a clinical biomarker. We immunostained a tissue microarray containing biopsy samples of 164 GBM patients from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the National Cancer Institute of Canada (EORTC/NCIC) trial 26981/22981 using two commercial anti-MGMT antibodies (clones MT3.1 and MT23.2). Immunostaining results were semiquantitatively evaluated by four observers from three neuropathological laboratories using a predefined algorithm. We analyzed (i) inter- and intraobserver agreement on MGMT expression (kappa statistics); (ii) correlation of MGMT expression with MGMT promoter methylation status (kappa statistics); and (iii) correlation of MGMT expression with patient outcome (log-rank test). Interobserver agreement on MGMT expression varied from slight to almost perfect, whereas intraobserver agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect. MGMT expression showed poor to moderate correlation with MGMT promoter methylation status. We found no significant association of MGMT expression with patient outcome. In our hands, observer variability as well as lack of association with the MGMT promoter methylation status and patient survival impeded the use of anti-MGMT immunohistochemistry as a clinical biomarker for routine diagnostic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18400046     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Pathol        ISSN: 1015-6305            Impact factor:   6.508


  91 in total

1.  Usefulness of MS-MLPA for detection of MGMT promoter methylation in the evaluation of pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Chul-Kee Park; JinWook Kim; Su Youn Yim; Ah Reum Lee; Jung Ho Han; Chae-Yong Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Seung Hong Choi; Seung-Ki Kim; Dong Gyu Kim; Hee-Won Jung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  MGMT promoter methylation in malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Markus J Riemenschneider; Monika E Hegi; Guido Reifenberger
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  Correlation between quantified promoter methylation and enzymatic activity of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Yugo Kishida; Atsushi Natsume; Hiroshi Toda; Yuki Toi; Kazuya Motomura; Hiroko Koyama; Keiji Matsuda; Osamu Nakayama; Makoto Sato; Masaaki Suzuki; Yutaka Kondo; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-01-26

Review 4.  Update on molecular findings, management and outcome in low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  T David Bourne; David Schiff
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  [Molecular diagnostic testing in gliomas].

Authors:  M Hasselblatt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Combined analysis of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase protein expression and promoter methylation provides optimized prognostication of glioblastoma outcome.

Authors:  Shadi Lalezari; Arthur P Chou; Anh Tran; Orestes E Solis; Negar Khanlou; Weidong Chen; Sichen Li; Jose A Carrillo; Reshmi Chowdhury; Julia Selfridge; Desiree E Sanchez; Ryan W Wilson; Mira Zurayk; Jonathan Lalezari; Jerry J Lou; Laurel Ormiston; Karen Ancheta; Robert Hanna; Paul Miller; David Piccioni; Benjamin M Ellingson; Colin Buchanan; Paul S Mischel; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Richard Green; He-Jing Wang; Whitney B Pope; Linda M Liau; Robert M Elashoff; Timothy F Cloughesy; William H Yong; Albert Lai
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Delineation of MGMT Hypermethylation as a Biomarker for Veliparib-Mediated Temozolomide-Sensitizing Therapy of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Shiv K Gupta; Sani H Kizilbash; Brett L Carlson; Ann C Mladek; Felix Boakye-Agyeman; Katrina K Bakken; Jenny L Pokorny; Mark A Schroeder; Paul A Decker; Ling Cen; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Gobinda Sarkar; Karla V Ballman; Joel M Reid; Robert B Jenkins; Roeland G Verhaak; Erik P Sulman; Gaspar J Kitange; Jann N Sarkaria
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Absence of the MGMT protein as well as methylation of the MGMT promoter predict the sensitivity for temozolomide.

Authors:  K A van Nifterik; J van den Berg; W F van der Meide; N Ameziane; L E Wedekind; R D M Steenbergen; S Leenstra; M V M Lafleur; B J Slotman; L J A Stalpers; P Sminia
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Homogeneous MGMT immunoreactivity correlates with an unmethylated MGMT promoter status in brain metastases of various solid tumors.

Authors:  Barbara Ingold; Peter Schraml; Frank L Heppner; Holger Moch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Extent of MGMT promoter methylation correlates with outcome in glioblastomas given temozolomide and radiotherapy.

Authors:  J Dunn; A Baborie; F Alam; K Joyce; M Moxham; R Sibson; D Crooks; D Husband; A Shenoy; A Brodbelt; H Wong; T Liloglou; B Haylock; C Walker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.