Literature DB >> 20550573

The distinctive footprints of local hitchhiking in a varied environment and global hitchhiking in a subdivided population.

Nicolas Bierne1.   

Abstract

Loci with higher levels of population differentiation than the neutral expectation are traditionally interpreted as evidence of ongoing selection that varies in space. This article emphasizes an alternative explanation that has been largely overlooked to date: in species subdivided into large subpopulations, enhanced differentiation can also be the signature left by the fixation of an unconditionally favorable mutation on its chromosomal neighborhood. This is because the hitchhiking effect is expected to diminish as the favorable mutation spreads from the deme in which it originated to other demes. To discriminate among the two alternative scenarios one needs to investigate how genetic structure varies along the chromosomal region of the locus. Local hitchhiking is shown to generate a single sharp peak of differentiation centered on the adaptive polymorphism and the standard signature of a selective sweep only in those subpopulations in which the allele is favored. Global hitchhiking produces two domes of differentiation on either side of the fixed advantageous mutation and signatures of a selective sweep in every subpopulation, albeit of different magnitude. Investigating population differentiation around a locus that strongly differentiates two otherwise genetically similar populations of the marine mussel Mytilus edulis, plausible evidence for the global hitchhiking hypothesis has been obtained. Global hitchhiking is a neglected phenomenon that might prove to be important in species with large population sizes such as many marine invertebrates.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550573     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01050.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  26 in total

1.  Hitchhiking effect of a beneficial mutation spreading in a subdivided population.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim; Takahiro Maruki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Population genomics perspectives on convergent adaptation.

Authors:  Kristin M Lee; Graham Coop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Selective Sweeps.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Detecting the footprints of divergent selection in oaks with linked markers.

Authors:  P G Goicoechea; R J Petit; A Kremer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  The genomic signature of parallel adaptation from shared genetic variation.

Authors:  Marius Roesti; Sergey Gavrilets; Andrew P Hendry; Walter Salzburger; Daniel Berner
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Gene-flow in a mosaic hybrid zone: is local introgression adaptive?

Authors:  Christelle Fraïsse; Camille Roux; John J Welch; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genome-wide patterns of divergence during speciation: the lake whitefish case study.

Authors:  S Renaut; N Maillet; E Normandeau; C Sauvage; N Derome; S M Rogers; L Bernatchez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Distinguishing Among Modes of Convergent Adaptation Using Population Genomic Data.

Authors:  Kristin M Lee; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Microsatellite analysis of chloroquine resistance associated alleles and neutral loci reveal genetic structure of Indian Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Prashant K Mallick; Patrick L Sutton; Ruchi Singh; Om P Singh; Aditya P Dash; Ashok K Singh; Jane M Carlton; Virendra K Bhasin
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.