Literature DB >> 20549761

The communicative content of the common marmoset phee call during antiphonal calling.

Cory T Miller1, Katherine Mandel, Xiaoqin Wang.   

Abstract

Vocalizations are a dominant means of communication for numerous species, including nonhuman primates. These acoustic signals are encoded with a rich array of information available to signal receivers that can be used to guide species-typical behaviors. In this study, we examined the communicative content of common marmoset phee calls, the species-typical long distance contact call, during antiphonal calling. This call type has a relatively stereotyped acoustic structure, consisting of a series of long tonal pulses. Analyses revealed that calls could be reliably classified based on the individual identity and social group of the caller. Our analyses did not, however, correctly classify phee calls recorded under different social contexts, although differences were evident along individual acoustic parameters. Further tests of antiphonal calling interactions showed that spontaneously produced phee calls differ from antiphonal phee calls in their peak and end frequency, which may be functionally significant. Overall, this study shows that the marmoset phee call has a rich communicative content encoded in its acoustic structure available to conspecifics during antiphonal calling exchanges.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549761      PMCID: PMC3715969          DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  19 in total

1.  Dialects in pygmy marmosets? Population variation in call structure.

Authors:  Stella de la Torre; Charles T Snowdon
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Categorical perception of a natural stimulus continuum: birdsong.

Authors:  D A Nelson; P Marler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Tracking silence: adjusting vocal production to avoid acoustic interference.

Authors:  S E Roian Egnor; Jeanette Graham Wickelgren; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Sensory-motor interactions modulate a primate vocal behavior: antiphonal calling in common marmosets.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Matching of acoustic features during the vocal exchange of coo calls by Japanese macaques

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Acoustic analysis of vocal development in a New World primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Ashley L Pistorio; Brett Vintch; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  A paradox in the evolution of primate vocal learning.

Authors:  S E Roian Egnor; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Sex differences in the acoustic structure of vowel-like grunt vocalizations in baboons and their perceptual discrimination by baboon listeners.

Authors:  Drew Rendall; Michael J Owren; Elise Weerts; Robert D Hienz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Interruptibility of long call production in tamarins: implications for vocal control.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Stephen Flusberg; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Multiple acoustic features underlie vocal signal recognition in tamarins: antiphonal calling experiments.

Authors:  C T Miller; M D Hauser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  30 in total

1.  Individual recognition during bouts of antiphonal calling in common marmosets.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; A Wren Thomas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Social Context-Dependent Activity in Marmoset Frontal Cortex Populations during Natural Conversations.

Authors:  Samuel U Nummela; Vladimir Jovanovic; Lisa de la Mothe; Cory T Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Responses of primate frontal cortex neurons during natural vocal communication.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; A Wren Thomas; Samuel U Nummela; Lisa A de la Mothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Marmosets: A Neuroscientific Model of Human Social Behavior.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Winrich A Freiwald; David A Leopold; Jude F Mitchell; Afonso C Silva; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Vocal turn-taking in a non-human primate is learned during ontogeny.

Authors:  Cecilia P Chow; Jude F Mitchell; Cory T Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  The marmoset monkey as a model for visual neuroscience.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; David A Leopold
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.304

Review 7.  The neurobiology of innate, volitional and learned vocalizations in mammals and birds.

Authors:  Andreas Nieder; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Cooperative vocal control in marmoset monkeys via vocal feedback.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Choi; Daniel Y Takahashi; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The effect of habitat acoustics on common marmoset vocal signal transmission.

Authors:  Ryan J Morrill; A Wren Thomas; Nicola Schiel; Antonio Souto; Cory T Miller
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.371

10.  Machine Learning Algorithms for Automatic Classification of Marmoset Vocalizations.

Authors:  Hjalmar K Turesson; Sidarta Ribeiro; Danillo R Pereira; João P Papa; Victor Hugo C de Albuquerque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.