Literature DB >> 20549366

Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jawdat Abdulla1, Camilla Asferg, Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed.   

Abstract

To determine via a meta-analysis the prognostic value of 64-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) by quantifying risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in different patient groups classified according to CT angiographic findings. A systematic literature search and meta-analyses was conducted on 10 studies examining stable, symptomatic and intermediate risk patients by 64-slice CTA. Patients were followed up for a mean of 21 month. Patient groups with CT-angiographic non-obstructive (stenosis <50% of luminal narrowing) or obstructive (stenosis ≥50% of luminal narrowing) CAD were compared to those having normal angiography without CAD. MACE (cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and revascularization) numbers were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in each group. Ten studies including 5,675 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. The cumulative MACE rate over 21 months were 0.5% in patients with normal CTA, 3.5% in non-obstructive CAD and 16% in obstructive CAD. Compared to normal CTA, non-obstructive CAD was associated with significant increased risk of MACE with OR=6.68 (3.01-14.82 CI 95%), P=0.0001. Obstructive CAD was associated with further significant increased risk of MACE with OR=41.19 (22.56-75.18, CI 95%), P=0.0001. The studies were homogenous, P-value >0.05 for heterogeneity. 64-slice CTA is able to differentiate low-risk from high-risk patients with suspected or known CAD. Absence of CAD predicts excellent prognosis, while obstructive CAD is associated with markedly increased risk of MACE. © Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549366     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9652-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  19 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Stephen Schroeder; Stephan Achenbach; Frank Bengel; Christof Burgstahler; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim de Feyter; Richard George; Philipp Kaufmann; Andreas F Kopp; Juhani Knuuti; Dieter Ropers; Joanne Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jacob M van Werkhoven; Joanne D Schuijf; Oliver Gaemperli; J Wouter Jukema; Eric Boersma; William Wijns; Paul Stolzmann; Hatem Alkadhi; Ines Valenta; Marcel P M Stokkel; Lucia J Kroft; Albert de Roos; Gabija Pundziute; Arthur Scholte; Ernst E van der Wall; Philipp A Kaufmann; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Benjamin J W Chow; George A Wells; Li Chen; Yeung Yam; Paul Galiwango; Arun Abraham; Tej Sheth; Carole Dennie; Rob S Beanlands; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jawdat Abdulla; Steen Z Abildstrom; Ole Gotzsche; Erik Christensen; Lars Kober; Christian Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Barbara Freissmuth; Tanja Meyer; Franziska Hein; Adnan Kastrati; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-04

8.  Cardiac computed tomographic angiography for risk stratification and prediction of late cardiovascular outcome events in patients with a chest pain syndrome.

Authors:  Ronen Rubinshtein; David A Halon; Tamar Gaspar; Nathan Peled; Basil S Lewis
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Prognostic utility of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Thomas P Carrigan; Deepu Nair; Paul Schoenhagen; Ronan J Curtin; Zoran B Popovic; Sandra Halliburton; Stacie Kuzmiak; Richard D White; Scott D Flamm; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  Ammar Sarwar; Leslee J Shaw; Michael D Shapiro; Ron Blankstein; Udo Hoffmann; Udo Hoffman; Ricardo C Cury; Suhny Abbara; Thomas J Brady; Matthew J Budoff; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-06
View more
  38 in total

1.  Prognostic value of non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography: where are we now?

Authors:  Ronen Rubinshtein; David A Halon; Basil S Lewis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Characteristics of high-risk coronary plaques identified by computed tomographic angiography and associated prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Camilla Thomsen; Jawdat Abdulla
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Stress MPI, coronary CTA, and multimodality for subsequent risk analysis.

Authors:  Masanao Naya; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Prognostic utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Yuka Otaki; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-12

Review 5.  New insights from major prospective cohort studies with cardiac CT.

Authors:  Sumbal A Janjua; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Coronary CT angiography: Beyond morphological stenosis analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 7.  Coronary CT angiography: State of the art.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Akmal Sabarudin
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

8.  Long-term prognostic value of coronary artery calcium scanning, coronary computed tomographic angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Carmela Nappi; Emanuele Nicolai; Stefania Daniele; Wanda Acampa; Valeria Gaudieri; Roberta Assante; Emilia Zampella; Sabrina Segreto; Massimo Imbriaco; Mario Petretta; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Long-term prognostic performance of low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering.

Authors:  Olivier F Clerc; Basil P Kaufmann; Mathias Possner; Riccardo Liga; Jan Vontobel; Fran Mikulicic; Christoph Gräni; Dominik C Benz; Tobias A Fuchs; Julia Stehli; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Risk of cardiovascular, cardiac and arrhythmic complications in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Stefano Ballestri; Amedeo Lonardo; Stefano Bonapace; Christopher D Byrne; Paola Loria; Giovanni Targher
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.