Literature DB >> 18718681

Cardiac computed tomographic angiography for risk stratification and prediction of late cardiovascular outcome events in patients with a chest pain syndrome.

Ronen Rubinshtein1, David A Halon, Tamar Gaspar, Nathan Peled, Basil S Lewis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced multidetector cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing anatomic coronary stenoses, but its role in predicting late clinical outcome events has not been well studied.
METHODS: We examined predictive value of CCTA for late major adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcome events (MACE)(CV death, myocardial infarction, myocardial revascularization) (follow-up 18.2+/-6.3, range 9-30 months) in 545 consecutive symptomatic patients (368 (68%) men, 177 (32%) women) with clinical suspicion, but without previously diagnosed, coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent 40- or 64-channel CCTA.
RESULTS: MACE occurred in 53/545 (9.7%) patients (early 30 day CCTA-driven events excluded): CV death/myocardial infarction in 3/327 (0.9%) patients with no coronary luminal narrowing >25% (group 1), in 3/127 (2.4%) with >or=1 luminal narrowing(s) of 26-69% (group 2) and in 9/91 (9.9%) with >or=1 coronary luminal narrowing(s) of >or=70% (group 3) (p<0.0001). CV death/myocardial infarction/revascularization occurred in 5/327 (1.5%) group 1 patients, 19/127 (14.9%) group 2 and 29/91 (31.9%) group 3 (p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis (adjusting for age, gender, coronary risk factors and coronary calcium score) identified CCTA stenosis (>25%) as a powerful independent predictor of MACE (HR 10.9, 95%CI 4.1-29.0, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: CCTA was useful to predict late clinical outcome events in patients undergoing evaluation of a chest pain syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718681     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  11 in total

1.  Prognostic value of non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography: where are we now?

Authors:  Ronen Rubinshtein; David A Halon; Basil S Lewis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Prognostic utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Yuka Otaki; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-12

Review 3.  Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jawdat Abdulla; Camilla Asferg; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Management strategies for patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Maame Yaa A B Yiadom; Joshua M Kosowsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-02

5.  Early Surgical Intervention Improves Survival in Acute Intestinal Ischemia in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Hassan Adnan Bukhari; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Impact of cardiac hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging on choice of treatment strategy in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Aju P Pazhenkottil; Rene N Nkoulou; Jelena-Rima Ghadri; Bernhard A Herzog; Silke M Küest; Lars Husmann; Mathias Wolfrum; Robert Goetti; Ronny R Buechel; Oliver Gaemperli; Thomas F Lüscher; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography for clinical imaging of stable coronary artery disease. Diagnostic classification and risk stratification.

Authors:  Grigorios Korosoglou; Sorin Giusca; Gitsios Gitsioudis; Christian Erbel; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Prognostic value of computed tomographic coronary angiography and exercise electrocardiography for cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Kye-Hwan Kim; Kyung Nyeo Jeon; Min Gyu Kang; Jong Hwa Ahn; Jin-Sin Koh; Yongwhi Park; Seok-Jae Hwang; Young-Hoon Jeong; Choong Hwan Kwak; Jin-Yong Hwang; Jeong Rang Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 9.  The value of multi-slice-computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification.

Authors:  Jacob M van Werkhoven; Jeroen J Bax; Gaetano Nucifora; J Wouter Jukema; Lucia J Kroft; Albert de Roos; Joanne D Schuijf
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Significant coronary stenosis in asymptomatic Chinese with different glycemic status.

Authors:  Yu Xu; Yufang Bi; Mian Li; Tiange Wang; Kun Sun; Min Xu; Jieli Lu; Yi Yu; Xiaoying Li; Shenghan Lai; Weiqing Wang; Guang Ning
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.