Literature DB >> 20549232

Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project: introduction, methods, and results of the newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (Part I).

Anna-Katharina Rohlfs1, Thomas Wiesner, Holger Drews, Frank Müller, Achim Breitfuss, Regina Schiller, Markus Hess.   

Abstract

From the actual point of view, the "sensitive period" for the effects of hearing impairment on speech and language development is within the first year of life. Early exposure to acoustic or electric stimulation can compensate for the acoustic deficit. A regional-based, specifically designed concept of a universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) was started in Hamburg in the year 2002. For the first time in Germany, a comprehensive protocol including screening measurement, follow-up procedures, tracking, and early intervention was implemented. An interdisciplinary approach from the very beginning could be realized. Sixty-three thousand, four hundred fifty-nine out of 65,466 births were registered during the period August 2002 to July 2006, 93% were primarily screened. 3.3% failed the test and 31.3% were lost to follow-up. A total of 118 children were diagnosed with hearing loss in the follow-up. The median age at time of diagnosis was 3.5 months. Seventy-four children received hearing aids. Out of these 74 children, 6 were subsequently supplied with cochlear implants. The high lost-to-follow-up rate is the biggest challenge for the tracking. Our results will be discussed in part II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549232     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-010-1228-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  14 in total

Review 1.  Delayed maturation and sensitive periods in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  A Kral; R Hartmann; J Tillein; S Heid; R Klinke
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Newborn hearing screening project using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Western Sicily experience.

Authors:  F Martines; M Porrello; M Ferrara; M Martines; E Martines
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant and length of device use.

Authors:  H Fryauf-Bertschy; R S Tyler; D M Kelsay; B J Gantz; G G Woodworth
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  [Congenital hearing disorders in children. 1: Acquired hearing disorders].

Authors:  M Gross; U Finckh-Krämer; M Spormann-Lagodzinski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  German registry for hearing loss in children: results after 4 years.

Authors:  U Finckh-Krämer; M Spormann-Lagodzinski; M Gross
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study.

Authors:  H M Fortnum; A Q Summerfield; D H Marshall; A C Davis; J M Bamford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

7.  Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases.

Authors:  Kai Uus; John Bamford
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Hearing screening of high risk newborns.

Authors:  N Swigonski; J Shallop; M J Bull; J A Lemons
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Reliability and effectiveness of screening for hearing loss in high risk neonates.

Authors:  R J McClelland; D R Watson; V Lawless; H G Houston; D Adams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-28

10.  Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention.American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998- 1999.

Authors:  A Erenberg; J Lemons; C Sia; D Trunkel; P Ziring
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  9 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Congenital hearing loss.

Authors:  Anna M H Korver; Richard J H Smith; Guy Van Camp; Mark R Schleiss; Maria A K Bitner-Glindzicz; Lawrence R Lustig; Shin-Ichi Usami; An N Boudewyns
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 52.329

3.  [Quality of universal newborn hearing screening results : Multicenter analysis of data recorded between 2009 and 2012 in four German states].

Authors:  P Matulat; S Fabian; A Köhn; M Spormann-Lagodziski; R Lang-Roth; A Rissmann; M Gross; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Universal newborn hearing screening : Definition of uniform parameters by the Association of German Hearing Screening Centers as a requirement for nationwide evaluation with valid results].

Authors:  I Brockow; M Praetorius; K Neumann; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; K Mohnike; P Matulat; K Rohlfs; R Lang-Roth; M Gross; E Duphorn; S Meuret; A Seidel; R Schönfeld; R Schönweiler; S Dienlin; A Rissmann; I Friedrich; B Lehnert; U Nennstiel-Ratzel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Unilateral hearing loss in children: a retrospective study and a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Johannes Friedhoff; Andrea Bohnert; Achim Breitfuss; Markus Hess; Frank Müller; Anke Strauch; Marianne Röhrs; Thomas Wiesner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 6.  Universal newborn hearing screening: methods and results, obstacles, and benefits.

Authors:  Katarzyna E Wroblewska-Seniuk; Piotr Dabrowski; Witold Szyfter; Jan Mazela
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 7.  Universal newborn hearing screening, a revolutionary diagnosis of deafness: real benefits and limitations.

Authors:  George X Papacharalampous; Thomas P Nikolopoulos; Dimitrios I Davilis; Ioannis E Xenellis; Stavros G Korres
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Evaluating reporting and process quality of publications on UNHS: a systematic review of programmes.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Mincarone; Carlo Giacomo Leo; Saverio Sabina; Daniele Costantini; Francesco Cozzolino; John B Wong; Giuseppe Latini
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?

Authors:  Marina Faistauer; Alice Lang Silva; Daniela de Oliveira Ruiz Dominguez; Renata Bohn; Têmis Maria Félix; Sady Selaimen da Costa; Letícia Petersen Schmidt Rosito
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.990

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.