Literature DB >> 3556807

Hearing screening of high risk newborns.

N Swigonski, J Shallop, M J Bull, J A Lemons.   

Abstract

Prospective screening of an extremely high risk group of 137 infants cared for in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit of the James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children was undertaken during 1983. Auditory brain stem responses (ABR) were obtained utilizing a clinical evoked potential system (Madsen 2250). Patients were selected for screening prior to discharge or transfer to the referring hospital on the basis of one or more of the following criteria: birth weight less than 1250 grams; birth weight less than 1500 grams and ventilatory support; significant depression at birth (Apgars less than 3 and 6 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively); seizures, meningitis, and/or sepsis. Of the original 137 infants tested, 82 passed the initial ABR, 22 conditionally passed, and 34 failed. Eighty-two infants had follow-up behavioral and audiometric testing while 20 infants died and 35 were lost to follow-up. Four infants had severe sensorineural hearing loss, each of whom had failed the initial ABR. None of the infants who initially passed or conditionally passed the ABR had sensorineural hearing loss on follow-up testing. High risk factors for sensorineural hearing loss in the neonatal period included: intraventricular/periventricular hemorrhage, apnea, family history, major malformations of the head and neck, and possibly hyperbilirubinemia and congenital infection. No relationship of sensorineural hearing loss with very low birth weight, hyponatremia, infection, seizures, or medications was found. On the basis of these data, it is suggested that electrophysiologic hearing screening of a high risk population may be delayed until 3 to 6 months of age to improve specificity of testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3556807     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198702000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  5 in total

1.  The potential risk factors and the identification of hearing loss in infants.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Biswas; S C Goswami; Dilip Kumar Baruah; Rajesh Tripathy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-09-04

2.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project: introduction, methods, and results of the newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (Part I).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Hearing loss in hydrocephalus: a review, with focus on mechanisms.

Authors:  David Satzer; Daniel J Guillaume
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Reliability and effectiveness of screening for hearing loss in high risk neonates.

Authors:  R J McClelland; D R Watson; V Lawless; H G Houston; D Adams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-28

5.  Assessment of Hearing Loss by OAE in Asphyxiated Newborns.

Authors:  Elaheh Amini; Zahra Kasheh Farahani; Mehdi Rafiee Samani; Hamed Hamedi; Ali Zamani; Alireza Karimi Yazdi; Fatemeh Nayeri; Firoozeh Nili; Golnaz Rezaeizadeh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.