Literature DB >> 20549185

Adaptations in single-leg hop biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Karl F Orishimo1, Ian J Kremenic, Michael J Mullaney, Malachy P McHugh, Stephen J Nicholas.   

Abstract

When a patient performs a clinically normal hop test based on distance, it cannot be assumed that the biomechanics are similar between limbs. The objective was to compare takeoff and landing biomechanics between legs in patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Kinematics and ground reaction forces were recorded as 13 patients performed the single-leg hop on each leg. Distance hopped, joint range of motion, peak joint kinetics and the peak total extensor moment were compared between legs during both takeoff and landing. Average hop distance ratio (involved/noninvolved) was 93 ± 4%. Compared to the noninvolved side, knee motion during takeoff on the involved side was significantly reduced (P = 0.008). Peak moments and powers on the involved side were lower at the knee and higher at the ankle and hip compared with the noninvolved side (Side by Joint P = 0.011; P = 0.003, respectively). The peak total extensor moment was not different between legs (P = 0.305) despite a decrease in knee moment and increases in ankle and hip moments (Side by Joint P = 0.015). During landing, knee motion was reduced (P = 0.043), and peak power absorbed was decreased at the knee and hip and increased at the ankle on the involved side compared to the noninvolved side (P = 0.003). The compensations by other joints may indicate protective adaptations to avoid overloading the reconstructed knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549185     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1185-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  24 in total

1.  Gender differences in lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and energy absorption during landing.

Authors:  Michael J Decker; Michael R Torry; Douglas J Wyland; William I Sterett; J Richard Steadman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; S M Lephart; J H Hwang; R S Wainner
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Predictors of proximal tibia anterior shear force during a vertical stop-jump.

Authors:  Timothy C Sell; Cheryl M Ferris; John P Abt; Yung-Shen Tsai; Joseph B Myers; Freddie H Fu; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees.

Authors:  S D Barber; F R Noyes; R E Mangine; J W McCloskey; W Hartman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Neuromuscular training techniques to target deficits before return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Mark V Paterno; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Motor performance in different dynamic tests in knee rehabilitation.

Authors:  K Pfeifer; W Banzer
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Kinetics of the lower extremities during drop landings from three heights.

Authors:  J L McNitt-Gray
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Electromyographic predictors of residual quadriceps muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Malachy P McHugh; Timothy F Tyler; Michael G Browne; Gilbert W Gleim; Stephen J Nicholas
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Effect of fatigue on single-leg hop landing biomechanics.

Authors:  Karl F Orishimo; Ian J Kremenic
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament injury influences joint loading during walking but not hopping.

Authors:  M A Risberg; H Moksnes; A Storevold; I Holm; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03-08       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  47 in total

1.  The clinical utility of functional performance tests within one-year post-acl reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Narducci; Amanda Waltz; Katheryn Gorski; Lucas Leppla; Megan Donaldson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Camille Neeter; Alexander Gustavsson; Pia Thomeé; Jesper Augustsson; Bengt Eriksson; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Landing mechanics during single hop for distance in females following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Stephanie M Trigsted; Eric G Post; David R Bell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A novel clinical approach for assessing hop landing strategies: a 2D telescopic inverted pendulum (TIP) model.

Authors:  Robert Letchford; Kate Button; Paul Adamson; Paulien E Roos; Valerie Sparkes; Robert W M van Deursen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Do ground reaction forces during unilateral and bilateral movements exhibit compensation strategies following ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Christian Baumgart; Markus Schubert; Matthias W Hoppe; Alli Gokeler; Jürgen Freiwald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Lower Limb Asymmetry After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gerwyn Hughes; Perry Musco; Samuel Caine; Lauren Howe
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Considerations for late stage acl rehabilitation and return to sport to limit re-injury risk and maximize athletic performance.

Authors:  Daniel P Bien; Thomas J Dubuque
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

8.  The impact of quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry on functional performance at return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Laura C Schmitt; Mark V Paterno; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Altered medial versus lateral hamstring muscle activity during hop testing in female athletes 1-6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K Briem; A M Ragnarsdóttir; S I Árnason; T Sveinsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Symmetry of squatting and the effect of fatigue following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Darren C Austin; Julian A Feller; Ross A Clark; Jodie A McClelland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.