Literature DB >> 12880714

Gender differences in lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and energy absorption during landing.

Michael J Decker1, Michael R Torry, Douglas J Wyland, William I Sterett, J Richard Steadman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gender differences exist in lower extremity joint motions and energy absorption landing strategies between age and skill matched recreational athletes.
DESIGN: Mixed factor, repeated measures design.
BACKGROUND: Compared to males, females execute high demand activities in a more erect posture potentially predisposing the anterior cruciate ligament to greater loads and injury. The preferred energy absorption strategy may provide insight for this performance difference.
METHODS: Inverse dynamic solutions estimated lower extremity joint kinematics, kinetics and energetic profiles for twelve males and nine females performing a 60 cm drop landing.
RESULTS: Females demonstrated a more erect landing posture and utilized greater hip and ankle joint range of motions and maximum joint angular velocities compared to males. Females also exhibited greater energy absorption and peak powers from the knee extensors and ankle plantar-flexors compared to the males. Examinations of the energy absorption contributions revealed that the knee was the primary shock absorber for both genders, whereas the ankle plantar-flexors muscles was the second largest contributor to energy absorption for the females and the hip extensors muscles for the males.
CONCLUSIONS: Females may choose to land in a more erect posture to maximize the energy absorption from the joints most proximal to ground contact. RELEVANCE: Females may be at a greater risk to anterior cruciate ligament injury during landing due to their energy absorption strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12880714     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00090-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  139 in total

1.  Knee kinematics following acl reconstruction in females; the effect of vision on performance during a cutting task.

Authors:  Jaynie Bjornaraa; Richard P Di Fabio
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  Gender differences in tibio-femoral kinematics and quadriceps muscle force during weight-bearing knee flexion in vitro.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  ACL Research Retreat V: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention, March 25-27, 2010, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Sex Differences in Landing Biomechanics and Postural Stability During Adolescence: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Sinéad Holden; Colin Boreham; Eamonn Delahunt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  A Systematic Evaluation of Field-Based Screening Methods for the Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Risk.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  A Comparison of the Habitual Landing Strategies from Differing Drop Heights of Parkour Practitioners (Traceurs) and Recreationally Trained Individuals.

Authors:  Regan J Standing; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  The Influence of Lower Extremity Lean Mass on Landing Biomechanics During Prolonged Exercise.

Authors:  Melissa M Montgomery; Amanda J Tritsch; John R Cone; Randy J Schmitz; Robert A Henson; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Knee kinematics is altered post-fatigue while performing a crossover task.

Authors:  Nelson Cortes; Eric Greska; Jatin P Ambegaonkar; Roger O Kollock; Shane V Caswell; James A Onate
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Sagittal-plane trunk position, landing forces, and quadriceps electromyographic activity.

Authors:  J Troy Blackburn; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.