PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgical techniques, an improved understanding of the ACL's biomechanical role, and expanding research on optimal rehabilitation practices in ACL-reconstructed (ACLR) patients, the re-tear rate remains alarmingly high and athletic performance deficits persist after completion of the rehabilitation course in a large percentage of patients. Significant deficits may persist in strength, muscular activation, power, postural stability, lower extremity mechanics, and psychological preparedness. Many patients may continue to demonstrate altered movement mechanics associated with increased injury risk. The purpose of this clinical commentary and literature review is to provide a summary of current evidence to assist the rehabilitation professional in recognizing, assessing, and addressing factors which may have been previously underappreciated or unrecognized as having significant influence on ACLR rehabilitation outcomes. METHODS: A literature review was completed using PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Database with results limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English. 136 articles were reviewed and included in this commentary. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to successful return to previous level of activity following ACLR are multifactorial.Recent research suggests that changes to the neuromuscular system, movement mechanics, psychological preparedness, and motor learning deficits may be important considerations during late stage rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5- Clinical Commentary.
PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgical techniques, an improved understanding of the ACL's biomechanical role, and expanding research on optimal rehabilitation practices in ACL-reconstructed (ACLR) patients, the re-tear rate remains alarmingly high and athletic performance deficits persist after completion of the rehabilitation course in a large percentage of patients. Significant deficits may persist in strength, muscular activation, power, postural stability, lower extremity mechanics, and psychological preparedness. Many patients may continue to demonstrate altered movement mechanics associated with increased injury risk. The purpose of this clinical commentary and literature review is to provide a summary of current evidence to assist the rehabilitation professional in recognizing, assessing, and addressing factors which may have been previously underappreciated or unrecognized as having significant influence on ACLR rehabilitation outcomes. METHODS: A literature review was completed using PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Database with results limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English. 136 articles were reviewed and included in this commentary. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to successful return to previous level of activity following ACLR are multifactorial.Recent research suggests that changes to the neuromuscular system, movement mechanics, psychological preparedness, and motor learning deficits may be important considerations during late stage rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5- Clinical Commentary.
Authors: Karl F Orishimo; Ian J Kremenic; Michael J Mullaney; Malachy P McHugh; Stephen J Nicholas Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2010-06-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Gregory D Myer; Larry Martin; Kevin R Ford; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt; Robert S Heidt; Angelo Colosimo; Timothy E Hewett Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Andrew D Lynch; David S Logerstedt; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Robert H Brophy; Leah Schmitz; Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Richard D Parker; Jack T Andrish; Eric C McCarty; Kurt P Spindler Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Christopher Kuenze; Jay Hertel; Susan Saliba; David R Diduch; Arthur Weltman; Joseph M Hart Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Brian G Pietrosimone; Adam S Lepley; Hayley M Ericksen; Phillip A Gribble; Jason Levine Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Matthew Buckthorpe; Furio Danelon; Giovanni La Rosa; Gianni Nanni; Matthew Stride; Francesco Della Villa Journal: Sports Med Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Julie P Burland; Adam S Lepley; Marc Cormier; Lindsay J DiStefano; Robert Arciero; Lindsey K Lepley Journal: Sports Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 11.136