Literature DB >> 20548239

Longitudinal development of phonology and morphology in children with late-identified mild-moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Mary Pat Moeller1, Elizabeth McCleary, Coille Putman, Amy Tyler-Krings, Brenda Hoover, Patricia Stelmachowicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies of language development in children with mild-moderate hearing loss are relatively rare. Longitudinal studies of children with late-identified hearing loss are relevant for determining how a period of unaided mild-moderate hearing loss impacts development. In recent years, newborn hearing screening programs have effectively reduced the ages of identification for most children with permanent hearing loss. However, some children continue to be identified late, and research is needed to guide management decisions. Furthermore, studies of this group may help to discern whether language normalizes after intervention and/or whether certain aspects of language might be vulnerable to persistent delays. The current study examines the impact of late identification and reduced audibility on speech and language outcomes via a longitudinal study of four children with mild-moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
DESIGN: Longitudinal outcomes of four children with late-identified mild-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were studied using standardized measures and language sampling procedures from at or near the point of identification (28 to 41 mos) through 84 mos of age. The children with hearing loss were compared with 10 age-matched children with normal hearing on a majority of the measures through 60 mos of age. Spontaneous language samples were collected from mother-child interaction sessions recorded at consistent intervals in a laboratory-based play setting. Transcripts were analyzed using computer-based procedures (Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts) and the Index of Productive Syntax. Possible influences of audibility were explored by examining the onset and productive use of a set of verb tense markers and by monitoring the children's accuracy in the use of morphological endings. Phonological samples at baseline were transcribed and analyzed using Computerized Profiling.
RESULTS: At entry to the study, the four children with hearing loss demonstrated language delays with pronounced delays in phonological development. Three of the four children demonstrated rapid progress with development and interventions and performed within the average range on standardized speech and language measures compared with age-matched children by 60 mos of age. However, persistent differences from children with normal hearing were observed in the areas of morphosyntax, speech intelligibility in conversation, and production of fricatives. Children with mild-moderate hearing loss demonstrated later than typical emergence of certain verb tense markers, which may be related to reduced or inconsistent audibility.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that early communication delays will resolve for children with late-identified, mild-moderate hearing loss, given appropriate amplification and intervention services. A positive result is that three of four children demonstrated normalization of broad language behaviors by 60 mos of age, despite significant delays at baseline. However, these children are at risk for persistent delays in phonology at the conversational level and for accuracy in use of morphological markers. The ways in which reduced auditory experiences and audibility may contribute to these delays are explored along with implications for evaluation of outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20548239      PMCID: PMC2932864          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181df5cc2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  28 in total

1.  Aided perception of /s/ and /z/ by hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Andrea L Pittman; Brenda M Hoover; Dawna E Lewis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Four new speech and prosody-voice measures for genetics research and other studies in developmental phonological disorders.

Authors:  L D Shriberg
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

3.  A comparison of three methods for obtaining articulatory responses.

Authors:  E M DuBois; J E Bernthal
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1978-08

4.  A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus.

Authors:  L D Shriberg; J Kwiatkowski; K Hoffmann
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-09

5.  Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children.

Authors:  M L Rice; K Wexler
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-12

6.  Oral communication skills of children who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  J L Elfenbein; M A Hardin-Jones; J M Davis
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

7.  Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children.

Authors:  J M Davis; J Elfenbein; R Schum; R A Bentler
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1986-02

8.  Outcomes of children with mild-profound congenital hearing loss at 7 to 8 years: a population study.

Authors:  Melissa Wake; Elizabeth K Hughes; Zeffie Poulakis; Christy Collins; Field W Rickards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Novel word learning in children with hearing impairment.

Authors:  M Gilbertson; A G Kamhi
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-06

10.  Phonological disorders I: a diagnostic classification system.

Authors:  L D Shriberg; J Kwiatkowski
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1982-08
View more
  23 in total

1.  Phonological Priming in Children with Hearing Loss: Effect of Speech Mode, Fidelity, and Lexical Status.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Nancy Tye-Murray; Markus F Damian; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Timeliness of service delivery for children with later-identified mild-to-severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Lenore Holte; Meredith Spratford; Jacob Oleson; Anne Welhaven; Melody Harrison
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Automated Vocal Analysis of Children With Hearing Loss and Their Typical and Atypical Peers.

Authors:  Mark VanDam; D Kimbrough Oller; Sophie E Ambrose; Sharmistha Gray; Jeffrey A Richards; Dongxin Xu; Jill Gilkerson; Noah H Silbert; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Reveal Changes in Audibility with Nonlinear Frequency Compression in Hearing Aids for Children: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Vicky W Zhang; Sanna Hou; Patricia Van Buynder
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

5.  Nonword repetition in children with cochlear implants: a potential clinical marker of poor language acquisition.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Emily Sansom; Jill Twersky; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  A randomized controlled trial of nonlinear frequency compression versus conventional processing in hearing aids: speech and language of children at three years of age.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Julia Day; Vicky Zhang; Harvey Dillon; Patricia Van Buynder; Mark Seeto; Sanna Hou; Vivienne Marnane; Jessica Thomson; Laura Street; Angela Wong; Lauren Burns; Christopher Flynn
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  A Multilinguistic Spelling Analysis of Children who are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Nancy A Quick; Melody Harrison; Karen Erickson
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2021-01-01

8.  Grammatical outcomes of 3- and 6-year-old children who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  Keegan M Koehlinger; Amanda J Owen Van Horne; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Point vowel duration in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants at 4 and 5 years of age.

Authors:  Mark VanDam; Dana Ide-Helvie; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Outcomes of early- and late-identified children at 3 years of age: findings from a prospective population-based study.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Harvey Dillon; Vivienne Marnane; Sanna Hou; Julia Day; Mark Seeto; Kathryn Crowe; Laura Street; Jessica Thomson; Patricia Van Buynder; Vicky Zhang; Angela Wong; Lauren Burns; Christopher Flynn; Linda Cupples; Robert S C Cowan; Greg Leigh; Jessica Sjahalam-King; Angel Yeh
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.