Literature DB >> 20544558

Embedded indices of effort in the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) in a geriatric sample.

Marie D Barker1, Michael David Horner, David L Bachman.   

Abstract

The clinical utility of embedded indices of effort in the RBANS was examined in a geriatric sample. Patients were classified as providing suspect effort (n = 45) or probable good effort (n = 258) using the TOMM and clinical consensus. Following the methodology of Silverberg and colleagues (2007), selected individual subtests and a summary Effort Index were evaluated. Setting specificity at approximately 85% yielded cut-offs of <15 on List Recognition, <8 on Digit Span, and >3 on the Effort Index. The modest sensitivity (51.1-64.4%) suggests that the indices should be used in conjunction with additional effort measures. In addition, the RBANS Picture Naming subtest was examined and showed modest sensitivity to detect suboptimal effort, but did not show notable incremental validity for detecting suboptimal effort beyond the Effort Index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20544558     DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2010.486009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  6 in total

1.  Brief report: the temporal stability of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Effort Index in geriatric samples.

Authors:  Kerry M O'Mahar; Kevin Duff; James G Scott; John F Linck; Russell L Adams; James W Mold
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  RBANS Validity Indices: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Robert D Shura; Timothy W Brearly; Jared A Rowland; Sarah L Martindale; Holly M Miskey; Kevin Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Using the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) effort index to predict treatment group attendance in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Raeanne C Moore; Taylor Davine; Alexandrea L Harmell; Veronica Cardenas; Barton W Palmer; Brent T Mausbach
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Comparison of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status effort scale and effort index in a dementia sample.

Authors:  Kathryn J Dunham; Sarah Shadi; Channing A Sofko; Robert L Denney; Jordan Calloway
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.813

5.  Effort in acute traumatic brain injury: considering more than pass/fail.

Authors:  Sara M Lippa; Kristina A Agbayani; Samuel Hawes; Emily Jokic; Jerome S Caroselli
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2014-08

6.  Comparison of conventional and actuarial neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Stephanie Fountain-Zaragoza; Sarah Ellen Braun; Michael David Horner; Andreana Benitez
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.