PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVE: Performance validity is often conceptualized as a dichotomous process. Effort likely lies on a continuum, however, and psychologists' tendency to rely on pass/fail descriptors of one's effort may not be the only approach. The current study aims to show that when performance validity is considered on a continuum, it may provide clinical information related to cognitive functioning. RESEARCH METHOD/ DESIGN: Forty-four patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury were evaluated with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status upon their emergence from posttraumatic amnesia. From this data, previously developed effort index scores and "other cognitive functions" index scores were calculated. RESULTS: Performance on the effort index significantly accounted for the patients' performance on a cognitive composite score after considering education and severity of injury. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that more in-depth analysis of validity test performance is beneficial to gauge a patient's level of effort and is important to consider when interpreting results and in treatment planning.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVE: Performance validity is often conceptualized as a dichotomous process. Effort likely lies on a continuum, however, and psychologists' tendency to rely on pass/fail descriptors of one's effort may not be the only approach. The current study aims to show that when performance validity is considered on a continuum, it may provide clinical information related to cognitive functioning. RESEARCH METHOD/ DESIGN: Forty-four patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury were evaluated with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status upon their emergence from posttraumatic amnesia. From this data, previously developed effort index scores and "other cognitive functions" index scores were calculated. RESULTS: Performance on the effort index significantly accounted for the patients' performance on a cognitive composite score after considering education and severity of injury. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that more in-depth analysis of validity test performance is beneficial to gauge a patient's level of effort and is important to consider when interpreting results and in treatment planning.
Authors: Kerry M O'Mahar; Kevin Duff; James G Scott; John F Linck; Russell L Adams; James W Mold Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Raeanne C Moore; Taylor Davine; Alexandrea L Harmell; Veronica Cardenas; Barton W Palmer; Brent T Mausbach Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Scott Mooney; Tarek I Hasssanein; Robin C Hilsabeck; Elizabeth A Ziegler; Meghan Carlson; Leeza M Maron; William Perry Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2007-02-05 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Robert D Shura; Timothy W Brearly; Jared A Rowland; Sarah L Martindale; Holly M Miskey; Kevin Duff Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Alexandra L Clark; Scott F Sorg; Dawn M Schiehser; Erin D Bigler; Mark W Bondi; Mark W Jacobson; Amy J Jak; Lisa Delano-Wood Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.710