Literature DB >> 20543911

ECM-Aware Cell-Graph Mining for Bone Tissue Modeling and Classification.

Cemal Cagatay Bilgin1, Peter Bullough, George E Plopper, Bülent Yener.   

Abstract

Pathological examination of a biopsy is the most reliable and widely used technique to diagnose bone cancer. However, it suffers from both inter- and intra- observer subjectivity. Techniques for automated tissue modeling and classification can reduce this subjectivity and increases the accuracy of bone cancer diagnosis. This paper presents a graph theoretical method, called extracellular matrix (ECM)-aware cell-graph mining, that combines the ECM formation with the distribution of cells in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained histopathological images of bone tissues samples. This method can identify different types of cells that coexist in the same tissue as a result of its functional state. Thus, it models the structure-function relationships more precisely and classifies bone tissue samples accurately for cancer diagnosis. The tissue images are segmented, using the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix, to compute spatial coordinates of cell nuclei as the nodes of corresponding cell-graph. Upon segmentation a color code is assigned to each node based on the composition of its surrounding ECM. An edge is hypothesized (and established) between a pair of nodes if the corresponding cell membranes are in physical contact and if they share the same color. Hence, multiple colored-cell-graphs coexist in a tissue each modeling a different cell-type organization. Both topological and spectral features of ECM-aware cell-graphs are computed to quantify the structural properties of tissue samples and classify their different functional states as healthy, fractured, or cancerous using support vector machines. Classification accuracy comparison to related work shows that ECM-aware cell-graph approach yields 90.0% whereas Delaunay triangulation and simple cell-graph approach achieves 75.0% and 81.1% accuracy, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20543911      PMCID: PMC2883793          DOI: 10.1007/s10618-009-0153-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Min Knowl Discov        ISSN: 1384-5810            Impact factor:   3.670


  23 in total

1.  Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data.

Authors:  T S Furey; N Cristianini; N Duffy; D W Bednarski; M Schummer; D Haussler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Asymptotic behaviors of support vector machines with Gaussian kernel.

Authors:  S Sathiya Keerthi; Chih-Jen Lin
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  A comparative study of fuzzy classification methods on breast cancer data.

Authors:  R Jain; A Abraham
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.430

4.  Cell-graph mining for breast tissue modeling and classification.

Authors:  Cagatay Bilgin; Cigdem Demir; Chandandeep Nagi; Bulent Yener
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

5.  Fractal characterization of chromatin appearance for diagnosis in breast cytology.

Authors:  A J Einstein; H S Wu; M Sanchez; J Gil
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Classification of normal colorectal mucosa and adenocarcinoma by morphometry.

Authors:  P W Hamilton; D C Allen; P C Watt; C C Patterson; J D Biggart
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Microscopic image analysis for quantitative measurement and feature identification of normal and cancerous colonic mucosa.

Authors:  A N Esgiar; R N Naguib; B S Sharif; M K Bennett; A Murray
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  1998-09

8.  The cell graphs of cancer.

Authors:  Cigdem Gunduz; Bülent Yener; S Humayun Gultekin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Baolin Wu; Tom Abbott; David Fishman; Walter McMurray; Gil Mor; Kathryn Stone; David Ward; Kenneth Williams; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  CELL SEGMENTATION USING HESSIAN-BASED DETECTION AND CONTOUR EVOLUTION WITH DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVES.

Authors:  I Ersoy; F Bunyak; M A Mackey; K Palaniappan
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Image Proc       Date:  2008-10-12
View more
  10 in total

1.  The regulation of focal adhesion complex formation and salivary gland epithelial cell organization by nanofibrous PLGA scaffolds.

Authors:  Sharon J Sequeira; David A Soscia; Basak Oztan; Aaron P Mosier; Riffard Jean-Gilles; Anand Gadre; Nathaniel C Cady; Bülent Yener; James Castracane; Melinda Larsen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Histopathological image analysis: a review.

Authors:  Metin N Gurcan; Laura E Boucheron; Ali Can; Anant Madabhushi; Nasir M Rajpoot; B Yener
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-30

3.  Quantification of three-dimensional cell-mediated collagen remodeling using graph theory.

Authors:  Cemal Cagatay Bilgin; Amanda W Lund; Ali Can; George E Plopper; Bülent Yener
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prediction of Growth Factor-Dependent Cleft Formation During Branching Morphogenesis Using A Dynamic Graph-Based Growth Model.

Authors:  Nimit Dhulekar; Shayoni Ray; Daniel Yuan; Abhirami Baskaran; Basak Oztan; Melinda Larsen; Bulent Yener
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Quantitative metric profiles capture three-dimensional temporospatial architecture to discriminate cellular functional states.

Authors:  Lindsey McKeen-Polizzotti; Kira M Henderson; Basak Oztan; C Cagatay Bilgin; Bülent Yener; George E Plopper
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Automatic tumor-stroma separation in fluorescence TMAs enables the quantitative high-throughput analysis of multiple cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Bernd Lahrmann; Niels Halama; Hans-Peter Sinn; Peter Schirmacher; Dirk Jaeger; Niels Grabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Multiscale feature analysis of salivary gland branching morphogenesis.

Authors:  Cemal Cagatay Bilgin; Shayoni Ray; Banu Baydil; William P Daley; Melinda Larsen; Bülent Yener
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Coupled analysis of in vitro and histology tissue samples to quantify structure-function relationship.

Authors:  Evrim Acar; George E Plopper; Bülent Yener
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Pathology imaging informatics for quantitative analysis of whole-slide images.

Authors:  Sonal Kothari; John H Phan; Todd H Stokes; May D Wang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  EpiGraph: an open-source platform to quantify epithelial organization.

Authors:  Pablo Vicente-Munuera; Pedro Gómez-Gálvez; Robert J Tetley; Cristina Forja; Antonio Tagua; Marta Letrán; Melda Tozluoglu; Yanlan Mao; Luis M Escudero
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.