Literature DB >> 20542150

Additional cryptic CNVs in mentally retarded patients with apparently balanced karyotypes.

Antoinet C J Gijsbers1, Cathy A J Bosch, Johannes G Dauwerse, Osdilly Giromus, Kerstin Hansson, Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee, Marjolein Kriek, Arie van Haeringen, Emilia K Bijlsma, Egbert Bakker, Martijn H Breuning, Claudia A L Ruivenkamp.   

Abstract

Apparently balanced chromosome abnormalities are occasionally associated with mental retardation (MR). These balanced rearrangements may disrupt genes. However, the phenotype may also be caused by small abnormalities present at the breakpoints or elsewhere in the genome. Conventional karyotyping is not instrumental for detecting small abnormalities because it only identifies genomic imbalances larger than 5-10 Mb. In contrast, high-resolution whole-genome arrays enable the detection of submicroscopic abnormalities in patients with apparently balanced rearrangements. Here, we report on the whole-genome analysis of 13 MR patients with previously detected balanced chromosomal abnormalities, five de novo, four inherited, and four of unknown inheritance, using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays. In all the cases, the patient had an abnormal phenotype. In one familial case and one unknown inheritance case, one of the parents had a phenotype which appeared identical to the patient's phenotype. Additional copy number variants (CNVs) were identified in eight patients. Three patients contained CNVs adjacent to one or either breakpoints. One of these patients showed four and two deletions near the breakpoints of a de novo pericentric inversion. In five patients we identified CNVs on chromosomes unrelated to the previously observed genomic imbalance. These data demonstrate that high-resolution array screening and conventional karyotyping is necessary to tie complex karyotypes to phenotypes of MR patients.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20542150     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2010.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Genet        ISSN: 1769-7212            Impact factor:   2.708


  9 in total

1.  Balanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilse Feenstra; Nicolien Hanemaaijer; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Helger Yntema; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Dorien Lugtenberg; Joke Verheij; Andrew Green; Roel Hordijk; William Reardon; Bert de Vries; Han Brunner; Ernie Bongers; Nicole de Leeuw; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Genomic Microarray in Intellectual Disability: The Usefulness of Existing Systems in the Interpretation of Copy Number Variation.

Authors:  Hela Ben Khelifa; Najla Soyah; Audrey Labalme; Helene Guilbert; Damien Sanlaville; Ali Saad; Soumaya Mougou-Zerelli
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2016-09-08

3.  Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements Require Nucleotide-Level Resolution: Lessons from Next-Generation Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Zehra Ordulu; Tammy Kammin; Harrison Brand; Vamsee Pillalamarri; Claire E Redin; Ryan L Collins; Ian Blumenthal; Carrie Hanscom; Shahrin Pereira; India Bradley; Barbara F Crandall; Pamela Gerrol; Mark A Hayden; Naveed Hussain; Bibi Kanengisser-Pines; Sibel Kantarci; Brynn Levy; Michael J Macera; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Erica Spiegel; Blair Stevens; Janet E Ulm; Dorothy Warburton; Louise E Wilkins-Haug; Naomi Yachelevich; James F Gusella; Michael E Talkowski; Cynthia C Morton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Chromosomal Microarrays: Understanding Genetics of Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Congenital Anomalies.

Authors:  Jill A Rosenfeld; Ankita Patel
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2016-05-30

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Origin, Phenotypic Effects and Diagnostic Implications of Complex Chromosome Rearrangements.

Authors:  Martin Poot; Thomas Haaf
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-08-15

6.  Complex nature of apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements in patients with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Tabet; Alain Verloes; Marion Pilorge; Elsa Delaby; Richard Delorme; Gudrun Nygren; Françoise Devillard; Marion Gérard; Sandrine Passemard; Delphine Héron; Jean-Pierre Siffroi; Aurelia Jacquette; Andrée Delahaye; Laurence Perrin; Céline Dupont; Azzedine Aboura; Pierre Bitoun; Mary Coleman; Marion Leboyer; Christopher Gillberg; Brigitte Benzacken; Catalina Betancur
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.509

7.  Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal setting.

Authors:  Luca Lovrecic; Ziga Iztok Remec; Marija Volk; Gorazd Rudolf; Karin Writzl; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  Array-comparative Genomic Hybridization Results in Clinically Affected Cases with Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements.

Authors:  N B Satkin; B Karaman; S Ergin; H Kayserili; I H Kalelioglu; R Has; A Yuksel; S Basaran
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 0.519

9.  The clinical utility of molecular karyotyping for neurocognitive phenotypes in a consanguineous population.

Authors:  Sarah M Al-Qattan; Salma M Wakil; Shamsa Anazi; Anas M Alazami; Nisha Patel; Ranad Shaheen; Hanan E Shamseldin; Samya T Hagos; Haya M AlDossari; Mustafa A Salih; Heba Y El Khashab; Amal Y Kentab; Mohammed N AlNasser; Fahad A Bashiri; Namik Kaya; Mais O Hashem; Fowzan S Alkuraya
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.