Literature DB >> 26732513

Mechanisms of Origin, Phenotypic Effects and Diagnostic Implications of Complex Chromosome Rearrangements.

Martin Poot1, Thomas Haaf1.   

Abstract

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) are currently defined as structural genome variations that involve more than 2 chromosome breaks and result in exchanges of chromosomal segments. They are thought to be extremely rare, but their detection rate is rising because of improvements in molecular cytogenetic technology. Their population frequency is also underestimated, since many CCRs may not elicit a phenotypic effect. CCRs may be the result of fork stalling and template switching, microhomology-mediated break-induced repair, breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, or chromothripsis. Patients with chromosomal instability syndromes show elevated rates of CCRs due to impaired DNA double-strand break responses during meiosis. Therefore, the putative functions of the proteins encoded by ATM, BLM, WRN, ATR, MRE11, NBS1, and RAD51 in preventing CCRs are discussed. CCRs may exert a pathogenic effect by either (1) gene dosage-dependent mechanisms, e.g. haploinsufficiency, (2) mechanisms based on disruption of the genomic architecture, such that genes, parts of genes or regulatory elements are truncated, fused or relocated and thus their interactions disturbed - these mechanisms will predominantly affect gene expression - or (3) mixed mutation mechanisms in which a CCR on one chromosome is combined with a different type of mutation on the other chromosome. Such inferred mechanisms of pathogenicity need corroboration by mRNA sequencing. Also, future studies with in vitro models, such as inducible pluripotent stem cells from patients with CCRs, and transgenic model organisms should substantiate current inferences regarding putative pathogenic effects of CCRs. The ramifications of the growing body of information on CCRs for clinical and experimental genetics and future treatment modalities are briefly illustrated with 2 cases, one of which suggests KDM4C (JMJD2C) as a novel candidate gene for mental retardation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex chromosome rearrangements; DNA double-strand break; Haploinsufficiency; Mixed mutation mechanisms; Structural genome variations; Triplosufficiency

Year:  2015        PMID: 26732513      PMCID: PMC4698629          DOI: 10.1159/000438812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Syndromol        ISSN: 1661-8769


  258 in total

1.  Molecular genetic analysis of a de novo balanced translocation t(6;17)(p21.31;q11.2) associated with hypospadias and anorectal malformation.

Authors:  Mahmoud Reza Mansouri; Birgit Carlsson; Edward Davey; Agneta Nordenskjöld; Tomas Wester; Göran Annerén; Göran Läckgren; Niklas Dahl
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Segmental copy number variation shapes tissue transcriptomes.

Authors:  Charlotte N Henrichsen; Nicolas Vinckenbosch; Sebastian Zöllner; Evelyne Chaignat; Sylvain Pradervand; Frédéric Schütz; Manuel Ruedi; Henrik Kaessmann; Alexandre Reymond
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-03-08       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis.

Authors:  P J Romanienko; R D Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Genome arrays for the detection of copy number variations in idiopathic mental retardation, idiopathic generalized epilepsy and neuropsychiatric disorders: lessons for diagnostic workflow and research.

Authors:  R Hochstenbach; J E Buizer-Voskamp; J A S Vorstman; R A Ophoff
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  High resolution mapping of OCA2 intragenic rearrangements and identification of a founder effect associated with a deletion in Polish albino patients.

Authors:  Caroline Rooryck; Fanny Morice-Picard; Eulalie Lasseaux; Dorothée Cailley; Hélène Dollfus; Sabine Defoort-Dhellemme; Bénédicte Duban-Bedu; Thomy J L de Ravel; Alain Taieb; Didier Lacombe; Benoît Arveiler
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma.

Authors:  Y Xu; T Ashley; E E Brainerd; R T Bronson; M S Meyn; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Cryptic genomic imbalances in de novo and inherited apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements: array CGH study of 47 unrelated cases.

Authors:  Caroline Schluth-Bolard; Bruno Delobel; Damien Sanlaville; Odile Boute; Jean-Marie Cuisset; Sylvie Sukno; Audrey Labalme; Bénédicte Duban-Bedu; Ghislaine Plessis; Sylvie Jaillard; Christèle Dubourg; Catherine Henry; Josette Lucas; Sylvie Odent; Laurent Pasquier; Henri Copin; Philippe Latour; Marie-Pierre Cordier; Gwenaël Nadeau; Marianne Till; Patrick Edery; Joris Andrieux
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Genic intolerance to functional variation and the interpretation of personal genomes.

Authors:  Slavé Petrovski; Quanli Wang; Erin L Heinzen; Andrew S Allen; David B Goldstein
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Deletions of exons with regulatory activity at the DYNC1I1 locus are associated with split-hand/split-foot malformation: array CGH screening of 134 unrelated families.

Authors:  Naeimeh Tayebi; Aleksander Jamsheer; Ricarda Flöttmann; Anna Sowinska-Seidler; Sandra C Doelken; Barbara Oehl-Jaschkowitz; Wiebke Hülsemann; Rolf Habenicht; Eva Klopocki; Stefan Mundlos; Malte Spielmann
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Cryptic deletions are a common finding in "balanced" reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients.

Authors:  M De Gregori; R Ciccone; P Magini; T Pramparo; S Gimelli; J Messa; F Novara; A Vetro; E Rossi; P Maraschio; M C Bonaglia; C Anichini; G B Ferrero; M Silengo; E Fazzi; A Zatterale; R Fischetto; C Previderé; S Belli; A Turci; G Calabrese; F Bernardi; E Meneghelli; M Riegel; M Rocchi; S Guerneri; F Lalatta; L Zelante; C Romano; M Fichera; T Mattina; G Arrigo; M Zollino; S Giglio; F Lonardo; A Bonfante; A Ferlini; F Cifuentes; H Van Esch; L Backx; A Schinzel; J R Vermeesch; O Zuffardi
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  33 in total

1.  The Growing Complexity of the Monosomy 1p36 Syndrome.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-03-31

2.  Chromothripsis and Duplications as Underappreciated Genomic Gremlins.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2020-12-07

3.  The Age of the Father.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-04-20

4.  Recombine and Associate to Prevent Genomic Instability and Premature Aging.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-11-17

5.  Of Simple and Complex Genome Rearrangements, Chromothripsis, Chromoanasynthesis, and Chromosome Chaos.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-01-14

6.  Retrotransposing Gremlins May Disrupt Our Brain's Genomes.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-12-10

7.  When Recessive Genes Mutate to Dominant Gene Action.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-09-14

8.  Discovering Patterns of Structural Variation by Mining Molecular Fossils.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-10-21

9.  Intragenic Deletions May Involve Enhancer Sequences and Alter CNTNAP2 Expression.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2018-05-09

10.  Syndromes Hidden within the 16p11.2 Deletion Region.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2018-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.