Literature DB >> 20542098

Observing responses: maintained by good news only?

Alan Silberberg1, Edmund Fantino.   

Abstract

Observing responses are those that produce stimuli correlated with the availability (S+) or non-availability (S-) of reinforcement but that has no influence on the actual delivery or timing of reinforcement. Prior research has shown that observing is maintained by the occasional production of the S+ ("good news") and not by production of the equally informative S- ("bad news"). However, for both humans and rats the S- maintains observing when it is at least implicitly correlated with good news. In the present study, pigeons could obtain both good and bad news by responding during the appropriate key color. In one condition, the bad news was actually more informative about reinforcement than was the good news. Nevertheless, a preponderance of the birds' responses was made on the nominally good-news option. The present results offer further support for the central role of good news in maintaining observing responses and are entirely consistent with the traditional conditioned-reinforcement (or classical conditioning) interpretation of observing. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20542098      PMCID: PMC2910158          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  10 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Observing responses and serial stimuli: searching for the reinforcing properties of the S-.

Authors:  Rogelio Escobar; Carlos A Bruner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Observing behavior in a computer game.

Authors:  D A Case; B O Ploog; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice As A Function Of Reinforcement Ratios In Delayed Matching-to-sample.

Authors:  J Hartl; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction.

Authors:  E Fantino; D A Case
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort.

Authors:  M Perone; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Teaching pigeons to commit base-rate neglect.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Inna Glaz Kanevsky; Shawn R Charlton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-10

9.  Human observing: maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response efficiency.

Authors:  D A Case; E Fantino; J Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Revisiting the role of bad news in maintaining human observing behavior.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.