Literature DB >> 16181446

Teaching pigeons to commit base-rate neglect.

Edmund Fantino1, Inna Glaz Kanevsky, Shawn R Charlton.   

Abstract

Whereas humans display base-rate neglect in a behavioral analogue of the base-rate problem, pigeons have been shown to behave optimally in a comparable task, appropriately weighting base-rate and case-cue information. Previous studies have shown that prior experience may interfere with optimal decisions for human subjects, a result consistent with the position that poor and illogical decisions often follow from the misapplication of learned rules. The present study shows that pigeons will also display base-rate neglect if given extensive pretraining with informative case cues. Two experiments with pigeons, in a matching-to-sample procedure designed to mimic the classic base-rate problem, show that pigeons display base-rate neglect after extensive pretraining with the matching task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181446     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01620.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  5 in total

1.  Use of base rates and case cue information in making likelihood estimates.

Authors:  Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino; Edmund Fantino; Nicholas Van Borst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

2.  Varying the costs of sunk costs: optimal and non-optimal choices in a sunk-cost task with humans.

Authors:  Raul Avila; Rachelle L Yankelevitz; Juan C Gonzalez; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Observing responses: maintained by good news only?

Authors:  Alan Silberberg; Edmund Fantino
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  The Monty Hall dilemma with pigeons: No, you choose for me.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Jacob P Case; Tiffany L Collins
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Choice behavior of pigeons (Columba livia), college students, and preschool children (Homo sapiens) in the Monty Hall dilemma.

Authors:  James E Mazur; Patricia E Kahlbaugh
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.231

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.