Literature DB >> 16812815

Choice As A Function Of Reinforcement Ratios In Delayed Matching-to-sample.

J Hartl, E Fantino.   

Abstract

Year:  1996        PMID: 16812815      PMCID: PMC1284559          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Judgment and decision making: Behavioral approaches.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1998

2.  Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Julia Schroeder
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Use of base rates and case cue information in making likelihood estimates.

Authors:  Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino; Edmund Fantino; Nicholas Van Borst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

4.  Matching-to-sample in pigeons: in the absence of sample memory, sample frequency is a better predictor of comparison choice than the probability of reinforcement for comparison choice.

Authors:  Kelly A DiGan; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Matching-to-sample by pigeons: the dissociation of comparison choice frequency from the probability of reinforcement.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer; Holly C Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  On the development and mechanics of delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Meredith S Berry; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.

Authors:  W V Dube; W J McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Observing responses: maintained by good news only?

Authors:  Alan Silberberg; Edmund Fantino
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Suboptimal choice in nonhuman animals: rats commit the sunk cost error.

Authors:  Paula Magalhães; K Geoffrey White; Tessa Stewart; Emma Beeby; William van der Vliet
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.