PURPOSE: To evaluate rates of visual field progression in eyes with optic disc hemorrhages and the effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction on these rates. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 510 eyes of 348 patients with glaucoma who were recruited from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and followed for an average of 8.2 years. METHODS: Eyes were followed annually with clinical examination, standard automated perimetry visual fields, and optic disc stereophotographs. The presence of optic disc hemorrhages was determined on the basis of masked evaluation of optic disc stereophotographs. Evaluation of rates of visual field change during follow-up was performed using the visual field index (VFI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The evaluation of the effect of optic disc hemorrhages on rates of visual field progression was performed using random coefficient models. Estimates of rates of change for individual eyes were obtained by best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). RESULTS: During follow-up, 97 (19%) of the eyes had at least 1 episode of disc hemorrhage. The overall rate of VFI change in eyes with hemorrhages was significantly faster than in eyes without hemorrhages (-0.88%/year vs. -0.38%/year, respectively, P<0.001). The difference in rates of visual field loss pre- and post-hemorrhage was significantly related to the reduction of IOP in the post-hemorrhage period compared with the pre-hemorrhage period (r = -0.61; P<0.001). Each 1 mmHg of IOP reduction was associated with a difference of 0.31%/year in the rate of VFI change. CONCLUSIONS: There was a beneficial effect of treatment in slowing rates of progressive visual field loss in eyes with optic disc hemorrhage. Further research should elucidate the reasons why some patients with hemorrhages respond well to IOP reduction and others seem to continue to progress despite a significant reduction in IOP levels. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
PURPOSE: To evaluate rates of visual field progression in eyes with optic disc hemorrhages and the effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction on these rates. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 510 eyes of 348 patients with glaucoma who were recruited from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and followed for an average of 8.2 years. METHODS: Eyes were followed annually with clinical examination, standard automated perimetry visual fields, and optic disc stereophotographs. The presence of optic disc hemorrhages was determined on the basis of masked evaluation of optic disc stereophotographs. Evaluation of rates of visual field change during follow-up was performed using the visual field index (VFI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The evaluation of the effect of optic disc hemorrhages on rates of visual field progression was performed using random coefficient models. Estimates of rates of change for individual eyes were obtained by best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). RESULTS: During follow-up, 97 (19%) of the eyes had at least 1 episode of disc hemorrhage. The overall rate of VFI change in eyes with hemorrhages was significantly faster than in eyes without hemorrhages (-0.88%/year vs. -0.38%/year, respectively, P<0.001). The difference in rates of visual field loss pre- and post-hemorrhage was significantly related to the reduction of IOP in the post-hemorrhage period compared with the pre-hemorrhage period (r = -0.61; P<0.001). Each 1 mmHg of IOP reduction was associated with a difference of 0.31%/year in the rate of VFI change. CONCLUSIONS: There was a beneficial effect of treatment in slowing rates of progressive visual field loss in eyes with optic disc hemorrhage. Further research should elucidate the reasons why some patients with hemorrhages respond well to IOP reduction and others seem to continue to progress despite a significant reduction in IOP levels. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Kaweh Mansouri; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Donald L Budenz; Julia Beiser Huecker; Steven J Gedde; Mae Gordon; Michael Kass Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Huiyuan Hou; Sasan Moghimi; Linda M Zangwill; James A Proudfoot; Tadamichi Akagi; Takuhei Shoji; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2019-11-14
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Grant Moore; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-01-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Tadamichi Akagi; Linda M Zangwill; Luke J Saunders; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Min Hee Suh; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ting Liu; Andrew J Tatham; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Alon Skaat; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Christopher A Girkin; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert Ritch; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-04-23 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Daniel Meira-Freitas; Renato Lisboa; Tung-Mei Kuang; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 12.079